Code density concerns for new architectures

Vincent M. Weaver, S. Mckee
{"title":"Code density concerns for new architectures","authors":"Vincent M. Weaver, S. Mckee","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing a program's instruction count can improve cache behavior and bandwidth utilization, lower power consumption, and increase overall performance. Nonetheless, code density is an often overlooked feature in studying processor architectures. We hand-optimize an assembly language embedded benchmark for size on 21 different instruction set architectures, finding up to a factor of three difference in code sizes from ISA alone. We find that the architectural features that contribute most heavily to code density are instruction length, number of registers, availability of a zero register, bit-width, hardware divide units, number of instruction operands, and the availability of unaligned loads and stores. We extend our results to investigate operating system, compiler, and system library effects on code density. We find that the executable starting address, executable format, and system call interface all affect program size. While ISA effects are important, the efficiency of the entire system stack must be taken into account when developing a new dense instruction set architecture.","PeriodicalId":256908,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Reducing a program's instruction count can improve cache behavior and bandwidth utilization, lower power consumption, and increase overall performance. Nonetheless, code density is an often overlooked feature in studying processor architectures. We hand-optimize an assembly language embedded benchmark for size on 21 different instruction set architectures, finding up to a factor of three difference in code sizes from ISA alone. We find that the architectural features that contribute most heavily to code density are instruction length, number of registers, availability of a zero register, bit-width, hardware divide units, number of instruction operands, and the availability of unaligned loads and stores. We extend our results to investigate operating system, compiler, and system library effects on code density. We find that the executable starting address, executable format, and system call interface all affect program size. While ISA effects are important, the efficiency of the entire system stack must be taken into account when developing a new dense instruction set architecture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新体系结构的代码密度问题
减少程序的指令计数可以改善缓存行为和带宽利用率,降低功耗,并提高整体性能。然而,在研究处理器体系结构时,代码密度是一个经常被忽视的特性。我们在21种不同的指令集体系结构上手动优化汇编语言嵌入式基准,发现仅从ISA中就可以发现代码大小的三倍差异。我们发现,对代码密度贡献最大的体系结构特征是指令长度、寄存器数量、零寄存器的可用性、位宽度、硬件划分单元、指令操作数的数量以及未对齐加载和存储的可用性。我们扩展了我们的结果来研究操作系统、编译器和系统库对代码密度的影响。我们发现可执行文件的起始地址、可执行文件的格式和系统调用接口都会影响程序的大小。虽然ISA的效果很重要,但在开发新的密集指令集体系结构时,必须考虑整个系统堆栈的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical performance models for 3T1D memories A novel SoC architecture on FPGA for ultra fast face detection A Technology-Agnostic Simulation Environment (TASE) for iterative custom IC design across processes Low-overhead error detection for Networks-on-Chip Interconnect performance corners considering crosstalk noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1