Atmospheric gravity waves as a possible candidate for seismo-ionospheric perturbations

M. Hayakawa, Y. Kasahara, T. Nakamura, Y. Hobara, A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, O. Molchanov, V. Korepanov
{"title":"Atmospheric gravity waves as a possible candidate for seismo-ionospheric perturbations","authors":"M. Hayakawa, Y. Kasahara, T. Nakamura, Y. Hobara, A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, O. Molchanov, V. Korepanov","doi":"10.1541/JAE.31.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The appearance of ionospheric perturbations in possible association with earthquakes (EQs) seems to be confirmed on the basis of both event and statistical studies, but the generation mechanism of those seismo-ionospheric perturbations is not well understood, though a few possible hypotheses have been proposed. Two hypotheses are promising candidates; one is so-called “chemical channel”, in which radon emanation results in the change in atmospheric conductivity, then in the atmospheric electric field, leading to the redistribution of ionospheric plasma, and the other is the excitation of atmospheric oscillations due to some precursory changes of ground surface, which propagate upward and induce the ionospheric perturbation. We support the second “atmospheric oscillation channel”, so that in this paper we present several evidences (or facts) in support of this hypothesis. First, we present some case studies of the enhancement of AGW (atmospheric gravity wave) modulation in subionospheric VLF/LF propagation data, and then a recent statistical treatment of this AGW modulation in VLF/LF data is reported. Further studies on the satellite observation and also on the satellite-ground coordinated measurements are presented in order to indicate the AGW as the agent of lithosphere-ionosphere coupling. Finally, our equipment recently developed to measure the Doppler-shift of a short-distance subionospheric LF signal is used to indicate the direct evidence of the AGW hypothesis. observational evidences of AGW fluctuations in subionospheric VLF/LF data, a statistical study of this AGW modulation in VLF/LF data, a case study and a statistical study on the mechanism on the basis of ground and satellite correlations, a new VLF/LF Doppler-shift observation, etc.","PeriodicalId":274637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atmospheric electricity","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atmospheric electricity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1541/JAE.31.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

: The appearance of ionospheric perturbations in possible association with earthquakes (EQs) seems to be confirmed on the basis of both event and statistical studies, but the generation mechanism of those seismo-ionospheric perturbations is not well understood, though a few possible hypotheses have been proposed. Two hypotheses are promising candidates; one is so-called “chemical channel”, in which radon emanation results in the change in atmospheric conductivity, then in the atmospheric electric field, leading to the redistribution of ionospheric plasma, and the other is the excitation of atmospheric oscillations due to some precursory changes of ground surface, which propagate upward and induce the ionospheric perturbation. We support the second “atmospheric oscillation channel”, so that in this paper we present several evidences (or facts) in support of this hypothesis. First, we present some case studies of the enhancement of AGW (atmospheric gravity wave) modulation in subionospheric VLF/LF propagation data, and then a recent statistical treatment of this AGW modulation in VLF/LF data is reported. Further studies on the satellite observation and also on the satellite-ground coordinated measurements are presented in order to indicate the AGW as the agent of lithosphere-ionosphere coupling. Finally, our equipment recently developed to measure the Doppler-shift of a short-distance subionospheric LF signal is used to indicate the direct evidence of the AGW hypothesis. observational evidences of AGW fluctuations in subionospheric VLF/LF data, a statistical study of this AGW modulation in VLF/LF data, a case study and a statistical study on the mechanism on the basis of ground and satellite correlations, a new VLF/LF Doppler-shift observation, etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大气重力波作为地震-电离层扰动的可能候选者
在事件研究和统计研究的基础上,电离层扰动的出现与地震(eq)的可能联系似乎得到了证实,但这些地震-电离层扰动的产生机制尚未得到很好的理解,尽管提出了一些可能的假设。有两种假设很有希望;一种是所谓的“化学通道”,氡辐射引起大气电导率的变化,然后在大气电场中引起电离层等离子体的重新分布;另一种是由于地面的一些前兆变化引起大气振荡的激发,这些振荡向上传播,诱发电离层扰动。我们支持第二个“大气振荡通道”,因此在本文中我们提出了几个证据(或事实)来支持这一假设。本文首先介绍了大气重力波调制在亚层VLF/LF传播数据中增强的一些实例,然后报道了近年来对这种大气重力波调制在VLF/LF数据中的统计处理方法。为了表明AGW是岩石圈-电离层耦合的媒介,本文提出了进一步的卫星观测和星地协调测量研究。最后,我们最近开发的用于测量近距离亚层低频信号的多普勒频移的设备被用来表明AGW假说的直接证据。亚层VLF/LF数据中AGW波动的观测证据,VLF/LF数据中AGW调制的统计研究,基于地面和卫星相关性的案例分析和机制统计研究,VLF/LF多普勒频移新观测等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of hailfall and lightning in a splitting thunderstorm observed on May 4, 2019 in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Japan System Feasibility of Transient Luminous Events Observation at the Summit of Mt. Fuji Light Intensity Profiles of Return Strokes at the Bottom of Rocket-triggered and Natural Lightning Channels Local variation of the superficial atmospheric electricity activity in a tropical region Submodal anomalies in Schumann resonance phenomenon possibly associated with earthquakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1