Remedial Consistency and Constructive Trust Claims

Peter Jaffey
{"title":"Remedial Consistency and Constructive Trust Claims","authors":"Peter Jaffey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3798734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article applies the concept of remedial consistency – consistency of a remedial right with a primary right – to the case of proprietary claims in the form of a constructive trust. The article explains how the concept of remedial consistency applies to the trust and to the constructive trust and the difference between breaches of duty and invalid transfers with respect to remedial consistency, and it applies the approach to three types of case: mistaken and unauthorised payments, fiduciary profits, and proprietary rights of cohabiting partners in the family home. It argues that the suggested approach can resolve some longstanding academic controversies and some practical problems in these areas.","PeriodicalId":376950,"journal":{"name":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3798734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article applies the concept of remedial consistency – consistency of a remedial right with a primary right – to the case of proprietary claims in the form of a constructive trust. The article explains how the concept of remedial consistency applies to the trust and to the constructive trust and the difference between breaches of duty and invalid transfers with respect to remedial consistency, and it applies the approach to three types of case: mistaken and unauthorised payments, fiduciary profits, and proprietary rights of cohabiting partners in the family home. It argues that the suggested approach can resolve some longstanding academic controversies and some practical problems in these areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补救一致性和建设性信托索赔
本文将救济一致性的概念——救济权利与主要权利的一致性——应用于建设性信托形式的所有权请求的情况。本文解释了补救一致性的概念如何适用于信托和建设性信托,以及在补救一致性方面违反义务和无效转让之间的区别,并将该方法应用于三种类型的案件:错误和未经授权的支付,信托利润和同居伙伴在家庭住宅中的所有权。本文认为,所提出的方法可以解决这些领域长期存在的一些学术争议和一些实际问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directors' Duties: Section 172 of the UK Companies Act Value Preservation Increasingly Acknowledged as Primary Purpose and Fiduciary Duty What Would Settlor Do? Immortal Trust Settlors, Federal Transfer Taxes, and the Protean Irrevocable Trust The Pluralist Foundations of Corporate Law and Governance A General Defense of Information Fiduciaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1