Value Preservation Increasingly Acknowledged as Primary Purpose and Fiduciary Duty

Sean Lyons
{"title":"Value Preservation Increasingly Acknowledged as Primary Purpose and Fiduciary Duty","authors":"Sean Lyons","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3785581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholder groups appear to intuitively understand that logically the delivery of sustainable long-term value requires a healthy focus on value creation and on value preservation. Historically organizations have explicitly addressed the value creation imperative at a strategic level through their vision, mission statement, and corporate strategy. The value preservation imperative however while perhaps sometimes implied has rarely been explicitly addressed in the same manner at a strategic level. The difference between explicitly addressing the value creation obligation and implicitly addressing the value preservation obligation is considerable, and its impact has already had a profound effect on corporate culture and resulting corporate behavior. \n \nThis paper outlines twelve significant developments which have occurred in recent times (2016 – 2020) as a growing number of regulators, standard setters, and other governance bodies finally begin to include explicit references to the value preservation imperative. These incremental steps are now directly impacting on corporate boardrooms as the moral obligation to preserve, protect, and defend stakeholder value is increasingly viewed as an important corporate consideration in terms of both company purpose and fiduciary duty.","PeriodicalId":376950,"journal":{"name":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stakeholder groups appear to intuitively understand that logically the delivery of sustainable long-term value requires a healthy focus on value creation and on value preservation. Historically organizations have explicitly addressed the value creation imperative at a strategic level through their vision, mission statement, and corporate strategy. The value preservation imperative however while perhaps sometimes implied has rarely been explicitly addressed in the same manner at a strategic level. The difference between explicitly addressing the value creation obligation and implicitly addressing the value preservation obligation is considerable, and its impact has already had a profound effect on corporate culture and resulting corporate behavior. This paper outlines twelve significant developments which have occurred in recent times (2016 – 2020) as a growing number of regulators, standard setters, and other governance bodies finally begin to include explicit references to the value preservation imperative. These incremental steps are now directly impacting on corporate boardrooms as the moral obligation to preserve, protect, and defend stakeholder value is increasingly viewed as an important corporate consideration in terms of both company purpose and fiduciary duty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价值保全日益被公认为首要目的和信义义务
利益相关者群体似乎直觉地理解,从逻辑上讲,可持续长期价值的交付需要健康地关注价值创造和价值保存。从历史上看,组织通过他们的愿景、使命声明和公司战略,在战略层面明确地解决了价值创造的必要性。然而,价值保护的必要性虽然有时可能是隐含的,但很少在战略层面上以同样的方式明确解决。明确履行价值创造义务和隐性履行价值保持义务之间的差异是相当大的,其影响已经对企业文化和由此产生的企业行为产生了深远的影响。本文概述了最近(2016年至2020年)发生的12项重大发展,因为越来越多的监管机构、标准制定者和其他治理机构最终开始明确提及价值保护的必要性。这些渐进的步骤现在直接影响到公司董事会,因为维护、保护和捍卫利益相关者价值的道德义务越来越被视为公司宗旨和受托责任方面的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directors' Duties: Section 172 of the UK Companies Act Value Preservation Increasingly Acknowledged as Primary Purpose and Fiduciary Duty What Would Settlor Do? Immortal Trust Settlors, Federal Transfer Taxes, and the Protean Irrevocable Trust The Pluralist Foundations of Corporate Law and Governance A General Defense of Information Fiduciaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1