Legal Constraints or Aggregate Individual Characteristics? Examining Factors of State R&D Intensity and Spending in the U.S.: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis

Koomin Kim
{"title":"Legal Constraints or Aggregate Individual Characteristics? Examining Factors of State R&D Intensity and Spending in the U.S.: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis","authors":"Koomin Kim","doi":"10.1145/3396956.3397003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the importance of R&D development and significant growth in R&D sector in the information technology era, it is crucial to examine the effect of budgetary institutions and aggregate individual characteristics. In this regards, this study empirically examines the impact of legal constraints and aggregate individual characteristics on state R&D related funding and expenditures by applying a system GMM analysis during the 17-year period (2000-2016).Several new findings are identified in this study. Budgetary institutions including legislative term limits and supermajority requirement effect state innovative capacity, and state R&D spending. State development and human capacity promote innovative capacity and R&D development, and Catholic work ethic enhances innovative capacity. Fiscal burden prevents states from promoting innovative capacity and R&D development, whereas economic downturn can serve as a motivator for additional spending on R&D activities for enhancing innovative capacity and R&D development. Further, these significant factors also reveal the long-term effect.","PeriodicalId":118651,"journal":{"name":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3397003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the importance of R&D development and significant growth in R&D sector in the information technology era, it is crucial to examine the effect of budgetary institutions and aggregate individual characteristics. In this regards, this study empirically examines the impact of legal constraints and aggregate individual characteristics on state R&D related funding and expenditures by applying a system GMM analysis during the 17-year period (2000-2016).Several new findings are identified in this study. Budgetary institutions including legislative term limits and supermajority requirement effect state innovative capacity, and state R&D spending. State development and human capacity promote innovative capacity and R&D development, and Catholic work ethic enhances innovative capacity. Fiscal burden prevents states from promoting innovative capacity and R&D development, whereas economic downturn can serve as a motivator for additional spending on R&D activities for enhancing innovative capacity and R&D development. Further, these significant factors also reveal the long-term effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律约束还是个人特征?美国国家研发强度与投入的影响因素:动态面板数据分析
考虑到信息技术时代研发发展的重要性和研发部门的显著增长,研究预算制度和总体个体特征的影响至关重要。在此基础上,本文运用系统GMM分析方法,实证考察了2000-2016年17年间法律约束和总体个体特征对国家研发相关资金支出的影响。在这项研究中发现了几个新的发现。包括立法任期限制和绝对多数要求在内的预算制度对国家创新能力和国家研发支出产生影响。国家发展和人的能力促进创新能力和研发发展,天主教职业道德促进创新能力。财政负担阻碍了国家促进创新能力和研发发展,而经济衰退可以作为国家增加研发活动支出以提高创新能力和研发发展的动力。此外,这些显著因素也揭示了长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing social media institutionalization in public administration. The role of inhibitors in local governments Keynote: Using Blockchain to Empower Digital Government An Overview of Ten Years of Liquid Democracy Research Session details: Artificial Intelligence Challenges and Implications for Public Management and Policy Smart City, Net Neutrality, and Antitrust: findings from Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1