{"title":"Związek wolnego rynku z dyktaturą polityczną: przejściowy czy trwały? Przykład Chin","authors":"Aniela Dylus","doi":"10.14746/cis.2018.46.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aniela Dylus, Związek wolnego rynku z dyktaturą polityczną: przejściowy czy trwały? Przykład Chin [The relation between free market economy and political dictatorship – is it of temporary or permanent nature? The example of China] edited by W. Banach, M.A. Michalski, J. Sójka, „Człowiek i Społeczeństwo” vol. XLVI: Między Chinami a Zachodem. Pytanie o źródła chińskiego sukcesu gospodarczego [Between China and the West. An inquiry into the sources of the Chinese economic miracle], Poznań 2018, pp. 103–119, Adam Mickiewicz University. Faculty of Social Sciences Press. ISSN 0239-3271.The relation between free market economy and democracy has been assumed as a paradigm in the western culture since the Enlightenment. However, this paradigm seems to be violated by markets that flourish under the political dictatorship. Are these markets the exceptions to the rule or maybe their scale does not indicate the necessity of paradigm change? Or maybe we are wrong to assume that capitalism flourish mainly in democratic systems? Is it possible that the relation between communist political dictatorship and liberal economy system is only of temporary nature and people that have economical freedom will demand sooner or later their political freedom? To answer these questions, (1) the paradigm of relationship between free market, its prosperity and democracy and (2) the arguments supporting this relationship have been discussed. Referring to Samuel Huntington’s theory, (3) it has been reminded that many factors, not only economical ones, decide about democratization of political life and some exceptions to this rule have been mentioned. (4) The example of contemporary China is one of the most spectacular example. The short characteristic of (5) its economic condition, (6) its economic system and political dictatorship has been presented and then the attempts have been made to give the arguments either for (7) temporary or (8) permanent relationship between free market and political dictatorship in China. Although the idea of democracy, the rule of law and human rights seems not to be the only alternative base of economical market system, it appears to be prevalent and the only one in a longer period.","PeriodicalId":444061,"journal":{"name":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2018.46.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aniela Dylus, Związek wolnego rynku z dyktaturą polityczną: przejściowy czy trwały? Przykład Chin [The relation between free market economy and political dictatorship – is it of temporary or permanent nature? The example of China] edited by W. Banach, M.A. Michalski, J. Sójka, „Człowiek i Społeczeństwo” vol. XLVI: Między Chinami a Zachodem. Pytanie o źródła chińskiego sukcesu gospodarczego [Between China and the West. An inquiry into the sources of the Chinese economic miracle], Poznań 2018, pp. 103–119, Adam Mickiewicz University. Faculty of Social Sciences Press. ISSN 0239-3271.The relation between free market economy and democracy has been assumed as a paradigm in the western culture since the Enlightenment. However, this paradigm seems to be violated by markets that flourish under the political dictatorship. Are these markets the exceptions to the rule or maybe their scale does not indicate the necessity of paradigm change? Or maybe we are wrong to assume that capitalism flourish mainly in democratic systems? Is it possible that the relation between communist political dictatorship and liberal economy system is only of temporary nature and people that have economical freedom will demand sooner or later their political freedom? To answer these questions, (1) the paradigm of relationship between free market, its prosperity and democracy and (2) the arguments supporting this relationship have been discussed. Referring to Samuel Huntington’s theory, (3) it has been reminded that many factors, not only economical ones, decide about democratization of political life and some exceptions to this rule have been mentioned. (4) The example of contemporary China is one of the most spectacular example. The short characteristic of (5) its economic condition, (6) its economic system and political dictatorship has been presented and then the attempts have been made to give the arguments either for (7) temporary or (8) permanent relationship between free market and political dictatorship in China. Although the idea of democracy, the rule of law and human rights seems not to be the only alternative base of economical market system, it appears to be prevalent and the only one in a longer period.
Aniela Dylus, Związek wolnego rynku z dyktaturopolitycznze: przejściowy czy trwały?Przykład Chin[自由市场经济与政治独裁的关系——是暂时的还是永久的?《中国的例子》,W. Banach, M.A. Michalski, J. Sójka,“Człowiek i Społeczeństwo”vol. XLVI: Między Chinami a Zachodem主编。Pytanie o źródła chińskiego sukcesu gospodarczego[在中国和西方之间]。《中国经济奇迹的来源探析》,《波兹纳霍》,2018年,第103-119页,亚当·米奇维茨大学。社会科学学院出版社。ISSN 0239 - 3271。自启蒙运动以来,自由市场经济与民主的关系一直被视为西方文化的一种范式。然而,这种模式似乎被在政治独裁统治下蓬勃发展的市场所违背。这些市场是规则的例外,还是它们的规模并不表明范式改变的必要性?又或者,我们认为资本主义主要在民主制度中繁荣的想法是错误的?共产主义政治专政与自由经济制度的关系是否只是暂时的,有经济自由的人迟早会要求政治自由?为了回答这些问题,本文讨论了(1)自由市场、繁荣和民主之间的关系范式,以及(2)支持这种关系的论据。参考塞缪尔·亨廷顿的理论,(3)提醒我们,决定政治生活民主化的不仅仅是经济因素,还有许多因素,并提到了这一规律的一些例外。(4)当代中国就是一个最引人注目的例子。(5)中国的经济状况,(6)中国的经济制度和政治独裁的短暂性,然后试图给出(7)中国的自由市场和政治独裁之间的暂时或(8)永久关系的论据。虽然民主、法治和人权的概念似乎不是经济市场制度的唯一替代基础,但它似乎是普遍的,并且在较长时期内是唯一的。