{"title":"The Geography of Hedge Funds","authors":"Melvyn Teo","doi":"10.1093/RFS/HHP007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the relationship between the risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds and their proximity to investments using data on Asia-focused hedge funds. I find, relative to an augmented Fung and Hsieh (2004) factor model, that hedge funds with a physical presence (head or research office) in their investment region outperform other hedge funds by 3.72% per year. The local information advantage is pervasive across all major geographical regions, but is strongest for emerging market funds and funds holding illiquid securities. These results are robust to adjustments for fund fees, serial correlation, backfill bias, and incubation bias. I show also that distant funds, especially those based in the United States and the United Kingdom, are able to raise more capital, charge higher fees, and set longer redemption periods, despite their underperformance relative to nearby funds. It appears that distant funds trade investment performance for better access to capital. The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org., Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":151026,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"234","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RFS/HHP007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 234

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between the risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds and their proximity to investments using data on Asia-focused hedge funds. I find, relative to an augmented Fung and Hsieh (2004) factor model, that hedge funds with a physical presence (head or research office) in their investment region outperform other hedge funds by 3.72% per year. The local information advantage is pervasive across all major geographical regions, but is strongest for emerging market funds and funds holding illiquid securities. These results are robust to adjustments for fund fees, serial correlation, backfill bias, and incubation bias. I show also that distant funds, especially those based in the United States and the United Kingdom, are able to raise more capital, charge higher fees, and set longer redemption periods, despite their underperformance relative to nearby funds. It appears that distant funds trade investment performance for better access to capital. The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org., Oxford University Press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对冲基金的地理分布
本文利用以亚洲为重点的对冲基金的数据,分析了对冲基金的风险调整绩效与其投资接近度之间的关系。我发现,相对于Fung和Hsieh(2004)的增长型因子模型,在其投资地区设有实体机构(总部或研究办公室)的对冲基金每年的表现比其他对冲基金高出3.72%。本地信息优势在所有主要地理区域普遍存在,但在新兴市场基金和持有非流动性证券的基金中最为明显。这些结果对于基金费用、序列相关性、回填偏差和孵化偏差的调整是稳健的。我还指出,远程基金,尤其是那些总部设在美国和英国的基金,能够筹集更多的资金,收取更高的费用,并设定更长的赎回期,尽管它们的表现不如附近的基金。似乎遥远的基金为了更好地获得资金而放弃了投资业绩。作者2009。牛津大学出版社代表金融研究学会出版。版权所有。有关许可,请发送电子邮件:journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.,牛津大学出版社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Links and Predictable Returns Return Cross-Predictability in Firms with Similar Employee Satisfaction Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small Option Implied Volatility, Skewness, and Kurtosis and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns Has Local Informational Advantage Disappeared?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1