Wellbore Placement Optimization Using Particulate Oil-Soluble Tracers

Marcus Jones, J. Larue
{"title":"Wellbore Placement Optimization Using Particulate Oil-Soluble Tracers","authors":"Marcus Jones, J. Larue","doi":"10.2118/194356-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Operators working with multiple stacked-pay reservoirs are challenged to optimize economic returns through their completion designs - not only in regards to horizontal well spacing, but also with vertical well spacing. Many of the popular Texas and New Mexico Wolfcamp formation sections exceed 1,000 feet in thickness and contain multiple hydrocarbon-rich benches. These benches and associated strata are complex mixtures of heterogenic geological factors such as weak/strong structural interfaces between facies, open/healed natural fractures, unpredictable fluid and pressure regimes, along with other lithological variables. Companies wrestle with the optimization of maximum hydrocarbon recovery within ever-present economic constraints when developing reservoir targeting strategies.\n This case study used multiple solid, oil-soluble tracers (OSTs) as an aid in reservoir characterization to determine optimal landing zones in the two unique Wolfcamp formations. This was accomplished by monitoring OST recovery data produced from grouping frac stages and reservoir zones over a 435 sampling day period. The two wells in this case study were intentionally drilled highly toe-up in order to cross all the potentially productive areas in two separate Wolfcamp benches; all stages were completed with the same stimulation design.\n The dynamics of the OST recovery provided insight into the variability of reservoir productivity within the Wolfcamp. Particular layers in the two wells exhibited initially high but transient OST recoveries, while other zones produced OSTs longer and more consistently. Using granular level tracer data in conjunction with other geoscience information, the operator was able to identify the formation layers having the highest potential for optimal production economics. This new methodology not only provided single-well placement optimization, but also important insights for future completions.","PeriodicalId":103693,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194356-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Operators working with multiple stacked-pay reservoirs are challenged to optimize economic returns through their completion designs - not only in regards to horizontal well spacing, but also with vertical well spacing. Many of the popular Texas and New Mexico Wolfcamp formation sections exceed 1,000 feet in thickness and contain multiple hydrocarbon-rich benches. These benches and associated strata are complex mixtures of heterogenic geological factors such as weak/strong structural interfaces between facies, open/healed natural fractures, unpredictable fluid and pressure regimes, along with other lithological variables. Companies wrestle with the optimization of maximum hydrocarbon recovery within ever-present economic constraints when developing reservoir targeting strategies. This case study used multiple solid, oil-soluble tracers (OSTs) as an aid in reservoir characterization to determine optimal landing zones in the two unique Wolfcamp formations. This was accomplished by monitoring OST recovery data produced from grouping frac stages and reservoir zones over a 435 sampling day period. The two wells in this case study were intentionally drilled highly toe-up in order to cross all the potentially productive areas in two separate Wolfcamp benches; all stages were completed with the same stimulation design. The dynamics of the OST recovery provided insight into the variability of reservoir productivity within the Wolfcamp. Particular layers in the two wells exhibited initially high but transient OST recoveries, while other zones produced OSTs longer and more consistently. Using granular level tracer data in conjunction with other geoscience information, the operator was able to identify the formation layers having the highest potential for optimal production economics. This new methodology not only provided single-well placement optimization, but also important insights for future completions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用颗粒油溶性示踪剂优化井筒布置
对于多层叠产层油藏,作业者面临着通过完井设计来优化经济效益的挑战,不仅要考虑水平井间距,还要考虑直井间距。德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州的Wolfcamp地层中,许多地层的厚度都超过了1000英尺,并且包含多个富含油气的层段。这些地层和伴生地层是非均质地质因素的复杂混合体,如相之间的弱/强结构界面、开放/愈合的天然裂缝、不可预测的流体和压力状况,以及其他岩性变量。在制定储层定位策略时,各公司都在努力在当前经济约束下实现最大油气采收率的优化。本案例研究使用了多种固体油溶性示踪剂(ost)作为储层表征的辅助工具,以确定Wolfcamp两个独特地层的最佳着陆点。这是通过监测在435个采样日期间从分组压裂段和储层产生的OST采收率数据来完成的。在本案例研究中,为了穿过Wolfcamp两个独立区块的所有潜在生产区域,这两口井被故意打得高度倾斜;所有压裂段都采用了相同的增产设计。OST采收率的动态变化为了解Wolfcamp油藏产能的可变性提供了依据。两口井的特定层段最初表现出较高但短暂的OST采收率,而其他层段的OST采收率则更长且更稳定。利用颗粒级示踪剂数据与其他地球科学信息相结合,作业者能够确定具有最佳生产经济潜力的地层层。这种新方法不仅提供了单井布局优化,而且为未来的完井提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Permian Basin Production Performance Comparison Over Time and the Parent-Child Well Study Real Time Analysis of Formation Face Pressures in Acid Fracturing Treatments Wellbore Placement Optimization Using Particulate Oil-Soluble Tracers Investigation of Non-Ideal Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests Behavior in Unconventional Reservoirs Poroelastic Pressure Transient Analysis: A New Method for Interpretation of Pressure Communication Between Wells During Hydraulic Fracturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1