Prevalence of the use of light technologies by the nursing staff of a state hospital

Pabliane Matias Lordelo Marinho, Thialla Andrade Carvalho, Maria Cláudia Tavares de Mattos, Eliana Ofélia Llapa-Rodriguez, M. P. D. A. Campos
{"title":"Prevalence of the use of light technologies by the nursing staff of a state hospital","authors":"Pabliane Matias Lordelo Marinho, Thialla Andrade Carvalho, Maria Cláudia Tavares de Mattos, Eliana Ofélia Llapa-Rodriguez, M. P. D. A. Campos","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.2017000400004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to describe the prevalence of the use of light technologies by the nursing team of a state hospital. Methods: cross-sectional and observational study. The sample consisted of 19 Nurses and 67 Nursing Technicians.The data were collected through direct simple observation using a validated instrument. Chi-square was used to compare the use of light technologies between the nursing categories. Results: there was prevalence of nursing technicians, females, with no partner and with an employment relationship. In the “Bonding” dimension, the interventions presence and security enhancement prevailed for nursing technicians and nurses, respectively. In the “Welcoming” dimension, surveillance and security were the most used by both categories. Conclusion: evaluation of the prevalence of light technologies showed that the dimensions “Welcoming” and “Bonding” were the most used by the nursing team and that nurses use them more often than the Nursing Technicians in the studied unit.","PeriodicalId":243005,"journal":{"name":"Northeast Network Nursing Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast Network Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2017000400004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: to describe the prevalence of the use of light technologies by the nursing team of a state hospital. Methods: cross-sectional and observational study. The sample consisted of 19 Nurses and 67 Nursing Technicians.The data were collected through direct simple observation using a validated instrument. Chi-square was used to compare the use of light technologies between the nursing categories. Results: there was prevalence of nursing technicians, females, with no partner and with an employment relationship. In the “Bonding” dimension, the interventions presence and security enhancement prevailed for nursing technicians and nurses, respectively. In the “Welcoming” dimension, surveillance and security were the most used by both categories. Conclusion: evaluation of the prevalence of light technologies showed that the dimensions “Welcoming” and “Bonding” were the most used by the nursing team and that nurses use them more often than the Nursing Technicians in the studied unit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国立医院护理人员使用轻型技术的情况
目的:描述某州立医院护理团队使用光技术的流行情况。方法:横断面和观察性研究。样本包括19名护士和67名护理技术员。数据是通过使用经过验证的仪器直接简单观察收集的。使用卡方比较护理类别之间光技术的使用情况。结果:护理技术人员以女性为主,无伴侣,有雇佣关系。在“联系”维度上,护理技术人员和护士的干预存在和安全增强分别占主导地位。在“欢迎”方面,两个类别中使用最多的是监视和安全。结论:光技术普及度评估显示,护理团队最常使用“欢迎”和“结合”维度,且护士使用频率高于研究单位的护理技术人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient guidance during discharge after a tracheostomy: an integrative review Building care gerontotechnologies in the context of elderly person with Alzheimer's disease Social representations attributed to prostate cancer by men undergoing follow-up at an in-hospital Oncology service Stigma perceived by mothers of children with congenital Zika virus syndrome The expert patient's contribution to the empowerment of people with diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1