Detecting Dissonant Stance in Social Media: The Role of Topic Exposure

Vasudha Varadarajan, Nikita Soni, Weixi Wang, C. Luhmann, H. A. Schwartz, Naoya Inoue
{"title":"Detecting Dissonant Stance in Social Media: The Role of Topic Exposure","authors":"Vasudha Varadarajan, Nikita Soni, Weixi Wang, C. Luhmann, H. A. Schwartz, Naoya Inoue","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address dissonant stance detection, classifying conflicting stance between two input statements.Computational models for traditional stance detection have typically been trained to indicate pro/con for a given target topic (e.g. gun control) and thus do not generalize well to new topics.In this paper, we systematically evaluate the generalizability of dissonant stance detection to situations where examples of the topic have not been seen at all or have only been seen a few times.We show that dissonant stance detection models trained on only 8 topics, none of which are the target topic, can perform as well as those trained only on a target topic. Further, adding non-target topics boosts performance further up to approximately 32 topics where accuracies start to plateau. Taken together, our experiments suggest dissonant stance detection models can generalize to new unanticipated topics, an important attribute for the social scientific study of social media where new topics emerge daily.","PeriodicalId":438120,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We address dissonant stance detection, classifying conflicting stance between two input statements.Computational models for traditional stance detection have typically been trained to indicate pro/con for a given target topic (e.g. gun control) and thus do not generalize well to new topics.In this paper, we systematically evaluate the generalizability of dissonant stance detection to situations where examples of the topic have not been seen at all or have only been seen a few times.We show that dissonant stance detection models trained on only 8 topics, none of which are the target topic, can perform as well as those trained only on a target topic. Further, adding non-target topics boosts performance further up to approximately 32 topics where accuracies start to plateau. Taken together, our experiments suggest dissonant stance detection models can generalize to new unanticipated topics, an important attribute for the social scientific study of social media where new topics emerge daily.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体中不和谐立场的发现:话题曝光的作用
我们解决了不协调的立场检测,分类两个输入语句之间的冲突立场。传统姿态检测的计算模型通常被训练为对给定目标主题(例如枪支管制)表示赞成或反对,因此不能很好地推广到新主题。在本文中,我们系统地评估了不和谐姿态检测的泛化性,在这些情况下,主题的例子根本没有被看到或只被看到过几次。我们表明,仅在8个主题上训练的不协调姿态检测模型,其中没有一个是目标主题,可以表现得与仅在目标主题上训练的模型一样好。此外,添加非目标主题将性能进一步提高到大约32个主题,准确度开始趋于平稳。综上所述,我们的实验表明,不和谐姿态检测模型可以推广到新的意想不到的话题,这是社交媒体社会科学研究的一个重要属性,因为社交媒体每天都会出现新的话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OLALA: Object-Level Active Learning for Efficient Document Layout Annotation Conspiracy Narratives in the Protest Movement Against COVID-19 Restrictions in Germany. A Long-term Content Analysis of Telegram Chat Groups. An Analysis of Acknowledgments in NLP Conference Proceedings Detecting Dissonant Stance in Social Media: The Role of Topic Exposure To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1