CREATED: Generating Viable Counterfactual Sequences for Predictive Process Analytics

Olusanmi Hundogan, Xixi Lu, Yupei Du, H. Reijers
{"title":"CREATED: Generating Viable Counterfactual Sequences for Predictive Process Analytics","authors":"Olusanmi Hundogan, Xixi Lu, Yupei Du, H. Reijers","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2303.15844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictive process analytics focuses on predicting future states, such as the outcome of running process instances. These techniques often use machine learning models or deep learning models (such as LSTM) to make such predictions. However, these deep models are complex and difficult for users to understand. Counterfactuals answer ``what-if'' questions, which are used to understand the reasoning behind the predictions. For example, what if instead of emailing customers, customers are being called? Would this alternative lead to a different outcome? Current methods to generate counterfactual sequences either do not take the process behavior into account, leading to generating invalid or infeasible counterfactual process instances, or heavily rely on domain knowledge. In this work, we propose a general framework that uses evolutionary methods to generate counterfactual sequences. Our framework does not require domain knowledge. Instead, we propose to train a Markov model to compute the feasibility of generated counterfactual sequences and adapt three other measures (delta in outcome prediction, similarity, and sparsity) to ensure their overall viability. The evaluation shows that we generate viable counterfactual sequences, outperform baseline methods in viability, and yield similar results when compared to the state-of-the-art method that requires domain knowledge.","PeriodicalId":321309,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.15844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Predictive process analytics focuses on predicting future states, such as the outcome of running process instances. These techniques often use machine learning models or deep learning models (such as LSTM) to make such predictions. However, these deep models are complex and difficult for users to understand. Counterfactuals answer ``what-if'' questions, which are used to understand the reasoning behind the predictions. For example, what if instead of emailing customers, customers are being called? Would this alternative lead to a different outcome? Current methods to generate counterfactual sequences either do not take the process behavior into account, leading to generating invalid or infeasible counterfactual process instances, or heavily rely on domain knowledge. In this work, we propose a general framework that uses evolutionary methods to generate counterfactual sequences. Our framework does not require domain knowledge. Instead, we propose to train a Markov model to compute the feasibility of generated counterfactual sequences and adapt three other measures (delta in outcome prediction, similarity, and sparsity) to ensure their overall viability. The evaluation shows that we generate viable counterfactual sequences, outperform baseline methods in viability, and yield similar results when compared to the state-of-the-art method that requires domain knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建:为预测过程分析生成可行的反事实序列
预测性流程分析侧重于预测未来的状态,例如运行流程实例的结果。这些技术通常使用机器学习模型或深度学习模型(如LSTM)来进行此类预测。然而,这些深度模型非常复杂,用户很难理解。反事实回答“假设”的问题,用来理解预测背后的原因。例如,如果不是给客户发电子邮件,而是打电话给客户呢?这一选择会导致不同的结果吗?当前生成反事实序列的方法要么不考虑过程行为,导致生成无效或不可行的反事实过程实例,要么严重依赖领域知识。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个使用进化方法生成反事实序列的一般框架。我们的框架不需要领域知识。相反,我们建议训练一个马尔可夫模型来计算生成的反事实序列的可行性,并采用其他三种度量(结果预测的delta、相似性和稀疏性)来确保它们的整体可行性。评估表明,我们生成了可行的反事实序列,在可行性方面优于基线方法,并且与需要领域知识的最先进方法相比,产生了相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PMDG: Privacy for Multi-Perspective Process Mining through Data Generalization CREATED: Generating Viable Counterfactual Sequences for Predictive Process Analytics Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning Why am I Waiting? Data-Driven Analysis of Waiting Times in Business Processes Probabilistic and Non-deterministic Event Data in Process Mining: Embedding Uncertainty in Process Analysis Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1