COVID Face Masks and the Wuhan Lab Escape Theory: An Update

C. Ross
{"title":"COVID Face Masks and the Wuhan Lab Escape Theory: An Update","authors":"C. Ross","doi":"10.31038/jnnc.2021422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Only a few months ago, a commentary, with supporting evidence, and a supporting quotation from the former head of the CDC, that the Wuhan lab leak theory for the origin of the COVID-19 epidemic “is a rational, reasonable, and scientifically grounded theory” could have been characterized as a conspiracy theory [1]. Now, a few months later, the Wuhan lab leak theory is being acknowledged widely in the mainstream media as just that – rational, reasonable, and scientifically grounded [2,3]. The fact that Chinese military experiments have been conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology has recently been confirmed by Mike Pompeo, a former US Secretary of State and former Director of the CIA [3], and is stated on a US Government website [4]: “Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017.” https://ge.usembassy.gov/ fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/","PeriodicalId":237353,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2021422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Only a few months ago, a commentary, with supporting evidence, and a supporting quotation from the former head of the CDC, that the Wuhan lab leak theory for the origin of the COVID-19 epidemic “is a rational, reasonable, and scientifically grounded theory” could have been characterized as a conspiracy theory [1]. Now, a few months later, the Wuhan lab leak theory is being acknowledged widely in the mainstream media as just that – rational, reasonable, and scientifically grounded [2,3]. The fact that Chinese military experiments have been conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology has recently been confirmed by Mike Pompeo, a former US Secretary of State and former Director of the CIA [3], and is stated on a US Government website [4]: “Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017.” https://ge.usembassy.gov/ fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID - 19口罩与武汉实验室逃生理论:最新进展
就在几个月前,一篇有佐证的评论,以及前疾控中心负责人的话,称武汉实验室泄露说是“理性、合理、有科学依据的理论”,简直可以被定性为阴谋论[1]。现在,几个月后,武汉实验室泄漏理论被主流媒体广泛认可——理性、合理、有科学依据[2,3]。中国在武汉病毒研究所进行军事实验的事实最近得到了美国前国务卿、前中央情报局局长迈克·蓬佩奥(Mike Pompeo)的证实[3],并在美国政府网站上发表声明[4]:“尽管武汉病毒研究所自称是一个民间机构,但美国已经确定武汉病毒研究所与中国军方在出版物和秘密项目上进行了合作。至少自2017年以来,WIV代表中国军方从事包括实验室动物实验在内的机密研究。https://ge.usembassy.gov/ fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan institute-of-virology/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Study and Review of the Literature Regarding Extradural Spinal Arachnoid Cyst Therapeutic Effect and Safety of Rectal Ozone Therapy in Mild and Moderate Symptomatic SARS CoV-2 Positive Patients Neurosarcoidosis: What are the Evocative Signs on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Facial Paralysis Revealing an Atypical Metastasis of Breast Cancer Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1