Predicting SPARQL Query Dynamics

Alberto Moya Loustaunau, A. Hogan
{"title":"Predicting SPARQL Query Dynamics","authors":"Alberto Moya Loustaunau, A. Hogan","doi":"10.1145/3460210.3493565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given historical versions of an RDF graph, we propose and compare several methods to predict whether or not the results of a SPARQL query will change for the next version. Unsurprisingly, we find that the best results for this task are achievable by considering the full history of results for the query over previous versions of the graph. However, given a previously unseen query, producing historical results requires costly offline maintenance of previous versions of the data, and costly online computation of the query results over these previous versions. This prompts us to explore more lightweight alternatives that rely on features computed from the query and statistical summaries of historical versions of the graph. We evaluate the quality of the predictions produced over weekly snapshots of Wikidata and daily snapshots of DBpedia. Our results provide insights into the trade-offs for predicting SPARQL query dynamics, where we find that a detailed history of changes for a query's results enables much more accurate predictions, but has higher overhead versus more lightweight alternatives.","PeriodicalId":377331,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3460210.3493565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given historical versions of an RDF graph, we propose and compare several methods to predict whether or not the results of a SPARQL query will change for the next version. Unsurprisingly, we find that the best results for this task are achievable by considering the full history of results for the query over previous versions of the graph. However, given a previously unseen query, producing historical results requires costly offline maintenance of previous versions of the data, and costly online computation of the query results over these previous versions. This prompts us to explore more lightweight alternatives that rely on features computed from the query and statistical summaries of historical versions of the graph. We evaluate the quality of the predictions produced over weekly snapshots of Wikidata and daily snapshots of DBpedia. Our results provide insights into the trade-offs for predicting SPARQL query dynamics, where we find that a detailed history of changes for a query's results enables much more accurate predictions, but has higher overhead versus more lightweight alternatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测SPARQL查询动态
给定RDF图的历史版本,我们提出并比较几种方法来预测SPARQL查询的结果在下一个版本中是否会改变。不出所料,我们发现这个任务的最佳结果可以通过考虑对以前版本的图的查询结果的完整历史来实现。但是,对于以前未见过的查询,生成历史结果需要对以前版本的数据进行昂贵的离线维护,并且需要对这些以前版本的查询结果进行昂贵的在线计算。这促使我们探索更轻量级的替代方案,这些替代方案依赖于从图的历史版本的查询和统计摘要中计算出的特征。我们通过每周的维基数据快照和每天的DBpedia快照来评估预测的质量。我们的结果提供了对预测SPARQL查询动态的权衡的见解,其中我们发现查询结果的详细更改历史可以实现更准确的预测,但是与更轻量级的替代方案相比,开销更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cat2Type: Wikipedia Category Embeddings for Entity Typing in Knowledge Graphs Toward Measuring the Resemblance of Embedding Models for Evolving Ontologies Cutting Events: Towards Autonomous Plan Adaption by Robotic Agents through Image-Schematic Event Segmentation Predicting SPARQL Query Dynamics Providing Humanitarian Relief Support through Knowledge Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1