AI Assurance for the Public – Trust but Verify, Continuously

P. Laplante, Rick Kuhn
{"title":"AI Assurance for the Public – Trust but Verify, Continuously","authors":"P. Laplante, Rick Kuhn","doi":"10.1109/STC55697.2022.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly seen in many public facing applications such as self-driving land vehicles, autonomous aircraft, medical systems and financial systems. AI systems should equal or surpass human performance, but given the consequences of failure or erroneous or unfair decisions in these systems, how do we assure the public that these systems work as intended and will not cause harm? For example, that an autonomous vehicle does not crash or that intelligent credit scoring system is not biased, even after passing substantial acceptance testing prior to release. In this paper we discuss AI trust and assurance and related concepts, that is, assured autonomy, particularly for critical systems. Then we discuss how to establish trust through AI assurance activities throughout the system development lifecycle. Finally, we introduce a “trust but verify continuously” approach to AI assurance, which describes assured autonomy activities in a model based systems development context and includes postdelivery activities for continuous assurance.","PeriodicalId":170123,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 29th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 29th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STC55697.2022.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly seen in many public facing applications such as self-driving land vehicles, autonomous aircraft, medical systems and financial systems. AI systems should equal or surpass human performance, but given the consequences of failure or erroneous or unfair decisions in these systems, how do we assure the public that these systems work as intended and will not cause harm? For example, that an autonomous vehicle does not crash or that intelligent credit scoring system is not biased, even after passing substantial acceptance testing prior to release. In this paper we discuss AI trust and assurance and related concepts, that is, assured autonomy, particularly for critical systems. Then we discuss how to establish trust through AI assurance activities throughout the system development lifecycle. Finally, we introduce a “trust but verify continuously” approach to AI assurance, which describes assured autonomy activities in a model based systems development context and includes postdelivery activities for continuous assurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众的人工智能保证——信任,但要不断验证
人工智能(AI)系统越来越多地出现在许多面向公众的应用中,如自动驾驶陆地车辆、自动驾驶飞机、医疗系统和金融系统。人工智能系统应该赶上或超过人类的表现,但考虑到这些系统失败或错误或不公平决策的后果,我们如何向公众保证这些系统按预期工作,不会造成伤害?例如,即使在发布之前通过了大量的验收测试,自动驾驶汽车也不会发生碰撞,或者智能信用评分系统不会有偏见。在本文中,我们讨论了人工智能信任和保证以及相关的概念,即保证自治,特别是对于关键系统。然后我们讨论如何在整个系统开发生命周期中通过AI保证活动建立信任。最后,我们介绍了一种“信任但持续验证”的人工智能保证方法,它描述了基于模型的系统开发环境中有保证的自主性活动,并包括持续保证的交付后活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Detection of Performance Regression Introducing Code Changes: Experience from the Git Project AI Assurance for the Public – Trust but Verify, Continuously Bayesian Approach for Regression Testing (BART) using Test Suite Prioritization Model-Agnostic Scoring Methods for Artificial Intelligence Assurance Project Features That Make Machine-Learning Based Fault Proneness Analysis Successful
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1