Modeling aspect mechanisms: a top-down approach

Sergei Kojarski, D. Lorenz
{"title":"Modeling aspect mechanisms: a top-down approach","authors":"Sergei Kojarski, D. Lorenz","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A plethora of aspect mechanisms exist today. All of these diverse mechanisms integrate concerns into artifacts that exhibit crosscutting structure. What we lack and need is a characterization of the design space that these aspect mechanisms inhabit and a model description of their weaving processes. A good design space representation provides a common framework for understanding and evaluating existing mechanisms. A well-understood model of the weaving process can guide the implementor of new aspect mechanisms. It can guide the designer when mechanisms implementing new kinds of weaving are needed. It can also help teach aspect-oriented programming (AOP). In this paper we present and evaluate such a model of the design space for aspect mechanisms and their weaving processes. We model weaving, at an abstract level, as a concern integration process. We derive a weaving process model (WPM) top-down, differentiating a reactive from a nonreactive process. The model provides an in-depth explanation of the key subprocesses used by existing aspect mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

A plethora of aspect mechanisms exist today. All of these diverse mechanisms integrate concerns into artifacts that exhibit crosscutting structure. What we lack and need is a characterization of the design space that these aspect mechanisms inhabit and a model description of their weaving processes. A good design space representation provides a common framework for understanding and evaluating existing mechanisms. A well-understood model of the weaving process can guide the implementor of new aspect mechanisms. It can guide the designer when mechanisms implementing new kinds of weaving are needed. It can also help teach aspect-oriented programming (AOP). In this paper we present and evaluate such a model of the design space for aspect mechanisms and their weaving processes. We model weaving, at an abstract level, as a concern integration process. We derive a weaving process model (WPM) top-down, differentiating a reactive from a nonreactive process. The model provides an in-depth explanation of the key subprocesses used by existing aspect mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方面机制建模:自顶向下的方法
目前存在大量的方面机制。所有这些不同的机制都将关注点集成到展示横切结构的工件中。我们所缺乏和需要的是对这些方面机制所处的设计空间的特征描述,以及对它们的编织过程的模型描述。良好的设计空间表示为理解和评估现有机制提供了一个通用框架。一个很好理解的编织过程模型可以指导新的方面机制的实现者。当需要实现新型织造的机构时,它可以指导设计者。它还可以帮助教授面向方面的编程(AOP)。在本文中,我们提出并评价了这样一个面向方面机制及其编织过程的设计空间模型。我们在抽象层次上将编织建模为关注集成过程。我们自顶向下推导了编织过程模型(WPM),将反应过程与非反应过程区分开来。该模型对现有方面机制使用的关键子过程提供了深入的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"How do I know what I have to do?": the role of the inquiry culture in requirements communication for distributed software development projects Software evolution: analysis and visualization Distributed development: an education perspective on the global studio project An empirical study on decision making in off-the-shelf component-based development Session details: Research papers: architecture & design I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1