O04.2 The impact of COVID-19 and associated response measures on STI transmission among MSM: a mathematical modelling study

M. Xiridou, J. Heijne, P. Adam, E. D. Coul, A. Matser, J. D. Wit, J. Wallinga, B. V. Benthem
{"title":"O04.2 The impact of COVID-19 and associated response measures on STI transmission among MSM: a mathematical modelling study","authors":"M. Xiridou, J. Heijne, P. Adam, E. D. Coul, A. Matser, J. D. Wit, J. Wallinga, B. V. Benthem","doi":"10.1136/SEXTRANS-2021-STI.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fear of COVID-19 infection and the response measures have affected sexual behaviours of men who have sex with men (MSM) and access to care for sexually transmitted infections (STI). We investigated whether these changes resulted in increased or decreased STI transmission among MSM. Methods We developed a mathematical transmission model for chlamydia and gonorrhoea among MSM. We accounted for 15–35% reduction in the number of casual partners and 50–80% reduction in STI testing during lockdowns (March-May 2020; October 2020 to February 2021); these reductions were 0–10% and 20–35%, respectively, in periods with less restrictive COVID-19 measures (June-September 2020, March-August 2021). Reductions until August 2020 were estimated from Dutch data; other reductions were based on expert opinion. We assumed no changes after August 2021. Two scenarios were examined: with home-testing (in 25% of cases not tested at healthcare facilities) and without home-testing. We calculated the percentage change in prevalence due to COVID-19 associated changes, compared to prevalence in the same year without changes due to COVID-19. Results From the model, we estimated an increase of 8.4% (interquartile range (IQR), 7.6–9.4%) in chlamydia prevalence and an increase of 7.5% (IQR, 6.0–8.9%) in gonorrhoea prevalence at the end of 2020 without home-testing, compared to the prevalence without COVID-19 associated changes. The increase subsided in 2021, but chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence remained higher than without COVID-19 until 2025. With home-testing, the percentage increase in 2020, compared to the scenario without COVID-19, was 5.3% (IQR, 4.6–5.9%) for chlamydia and 3.5% (IQR, 2.6–4.4%) for gonorrhoea prevalence. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted in an increase in chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence in 2020. The increase can be smaller after 2020, if STI testing at healthcare facilities and/or at home increases. The findings emphasize the importance of facilitating STI (self) care in times of crisis.","PeriodicalId":422365,"journal":{"name":"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/SEXTRANS-2021-STI.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Fear of COVID-19 infection and the response measures have affected sexual behaviours of men who have sex with men (MSM) and access to care for sexually transmitted infections (STI). We investigated whether these changes resulted in increased or decreased STI transmission among MSM. Methods We developed a mathematical transmission model for chlamydia and gonorrhoea among MSM. We accounted for 15–35% reduction in the number of casual partners and 50–80% reduction in STI testing during lockdowns (March-May 2020; October 2020 to February 2021); these reductions were 0–10% and 20–35%, respectively, in periods with less restrictive COVID-19 measures (June-September 2020, March-August 2021). Reductions until August 2020 were estimated from Dutch data; other reductions were based on expert opinion. We assumed no changes after August 2021. Two scenarios were examined: with home-testing (in 25% of cases not tested at healthcare facilities) and without home-testing. We calculated the percentage change in prevalence due to COVID-19 associated changes, compared to prevalence in the same year without changes due to COVID-19. Results From the model, we estimated an increase of 8.4% (interquartile range (IQR), 7.6–9.4%) in chlamydia prevalence and an increase of 7.5% (IQR, 6.0–8.9%) in gonorrhoea prevalence at the end of 2020 without home-testing, compared to the prevalence without COVID-19 associated changes. The increase subsided in 2021, but chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence remained higher than without COVID-19 until 2025. With home-testing, the percentage increase in 2020, compared to the scenario without COVID-19, was 5.3% (IQR, 4.6–5.9%) for chlamydia and 3.5% (IQR, 2.6–4.4%) for gonorrhoea prevalence. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted in an increase in chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence in 2020. The increase can be smaller after 2020, if STI testing at healthcare facilities and/or at home increases. The findings emphasize the importance of facilitating STI (self) care in times of crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病及相关应对措施对男男性行为者间性传播感染的影响:一项数学模型研究
对COVID-19感染的恐惧和应对措施影响了男男性行为者(MSM)的性行为和获得性传播感染护理的机会。我们调查了这些变化是否会导致MSM中性病传播的增加或减少。方法建立男男性接触者衣原体和淋病传播的数学模型。在封锁期间(2020年3月至5月;2020年10月至2021年2月);在COVID-19限制措施较少的时期(2020年6月至9月、2021年3月至8月),这些降幅分别为0-10%和20-35%。根据荷兰的数据估计,到2020年8月将减少;其他削减是根据专家意见作出的。我们假设2021年8月之后没有变化。研究了两种情况:进行家庭检测(25%的病例未在医疗机构进行检测)和不进行家庭检测。我们计算了因COVID-19相关变化导致的患病率变化百分比,与未因COVID-19导致变化的同一年患病率相比。从模型中,我们估计,与没有COVID-19相关变化的患病率相比,2020年底,没有家庭检测的衣原体患病率增加了8.4%(四分位数范围(IQR), 7.6-9.4%),淋病患病率增加了7.5% (IQR, 6.0-8.9%)。这一增长在2021年有所减缓,但直到2025年,衣原体和淋病患病率仍高于没有COVID-19的情况。与没有COVID-19的情况相比,通过家庭检测,2020年衣原体患病率增加5.3% (IQR, 4.6-5.9%),淋病患病率增加3.5% (IQR, 2.6-4.4%)。结论2019冠状病毒病大流行可能导致2020年衣原体和淋病流行率上升。如果在卫生保健机构和/或家庭进行的性传播感染检测增加,2020年之后的增幅可能会小一些。研究结果强调了在危机时期促进性传播感染(自我)护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
O04.6 Increased use of internet-based testing for sexually-transmitted and bloodborne infections during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada O04.2 The impact of COVID-19 and associated response measures on STI transmission among MSM: a mathematical modelling study O04.5 Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on accessing needed sexual health services during March–July 2020 in British Columbia (BC), Canada O04.3 The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STI services in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa O04.4 Measuring impacts of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health service use in Britain: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1