Comparative Study of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Medical Imaging

L. Lechelek, S. Gerbaud, R. Zrour, Mathieu Naudin, C. Guillevin, S. Horna
{"title":"Comparative Study of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Medical Imaging","authors":"L. Lechelek, S. Gerbaud, R. Zrour, Mathieu Naudin, C. Guillevin, S. Horna","doi":"10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.198-202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work presented in this paper is about comparison and analysis of four different reconstruction methods applicable to MR images. Two of them are based on the marching cube algorithm and the other two are contour based algorithms. We describe the studied reconstruction methods and compare their results. The comparative study examined, allows to establish similarity, equivalence, or distinctness between the four methods. We show that the various reconstruction methods produce different 3D models and each one has its own advantages and limitations.","PeriodicalId":166025,"journal":{"name":"CAD'21 Proceedings","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAD'21 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.198-202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work presented in this paper is about comparison and analysis of four different reconstruction methods applicable to MR images. Two of them are based on the marching cube algorithm and the other two are contour based algorithms. We describe the studied reconstruction methods and compare their results. The comparative study examined, allows to establish similarity, equivalence, or distinctness between the four methods. We show that the various reconstruction methods produce different 3D models and each one has its own advantages and limitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学影像三维重建方法的比较研究
本文的工作是对适用于磁共振图像的四种不同重建方法进行比较和分析。其中两种是基于行进立方体算法,另外两种是基于轮廓算法。我们描述了所研究的重建方法,并比较了它们的结果。通过比较研究,可以确定四种方法之间的相似性、等价性或差异性。我们表明,各种重建方法产生不同的三维模型,每种方法都有自己的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interior Ball-Pivoting on Point Clouds for Offsetting Triangular Meshes Modeling Coverage Areas of Anisotropic Transmitters by Voronoi-like Structures Hybrid Line-Arc Toolpath Machining with Corner Transition and Grouping Lookahead Scheme A Semi-Automatic CAD Procedure to Design Custom-made Surgical Cutting Guides Comparative Study of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Medical Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1