Kaleemullah Shaikh, Nasir Ahmed, Umer Kazi, A. Zia, Muhammad Zunair Aziz
{"title":"Comparison between Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in patients of resistant Diabetic Macular Edema","authors":"Kaleemullah Shaikh, Nasir Ahmed, Umer Kazi, A. Zia, Muhammad Zunair Aziz","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of suprachoroidal versus intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in cases of resistant diabetic macular edema.\nStudy Design: Quasi experimental study.\nPlace and Duration of Study: This research was executed at Retina Department of Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan between 1st January 2022 till 30th June 2022.\nMethods: Thirty-four patients with resistant diabetic macular edema were selected through convenient sampling and divided equally into two groups. All patients underwent ocular examination. Group I was given single Intravitreal injection (IVI) of 0.1 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide at 4 mg per 0.1 mL concentration. Group II received same dosage of drug via Suprachoroidal injection (SCI). After 24 hours, they were assessed for side effects. After 6 weeks, second dose of same drug was administered. Patients were followed at 3 and 6 months.\nResults: No serious side effect was observed in any patient within 24 hours. At 1 month follow-up period, comparison between the two groups for BCVA, CMT and IOP was not significant (p > 0.05). When the two groups were compared at 3 months, both routes were equally effective but IOP remained more stable via SCI route. At 6 months, IOP remained elevated in group I but decreased in group II (p = 0.003).\nConclusion: Triamcinolone Acetonide was effective by both routes in resistant diabetic macular edema in terms of improved BCVA and CMT but SCI was better in terms of IOP and cataract progression.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of suprachoroidal versus intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in cases of resistant diabetic macular edema.
Study Design: Quasi experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: This research was executed at Retina Department of Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan between 1st January 2022 till 30th June 2022.
Methods: Thirty-four patients with resistant diabetic macular edema were selected through convenient sampling and divided equally into two groups. All patients underwent ocular examination. Group I was given single Intravitreal injection (IVI) of 0.1 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide at 4 mg per 0.1 mL concentration. Group II received same dosage of drug via Suprachoroidal injection (SCI). After 24 hours, they were assessed for side effects. After 6 weeks, second dose of same drug was administered. Patients were followed at 3 and 6 months.
Results: No serious side effect was observed in any patient within 24 hours. At 1 month follow-up period, comparison between the two groups for BCVA, CMT and IOP was not significant (p > 0.05). When the two groups were compared at 3 months, both routes were equally effective but IOP remained more stable via SCI route. At 6 months, IOP remained elevated in group I but decreased in group II (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Triamcinolone Acetonide was effective by both routes in resistant diabetic macular edema in terms of improved BCVA and CMT but SCI was better in terms of IOP and cataract progression.