{"title":"Are Magi the Priests of Ancient Russia?","authors":"V. V. Chernykh","doi":"10.26516/2073-3380.2022.39.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the comparative and historical method, hermeneutics, anthropology and ethnography, and the principle of objectivity, the analysis of such social group of Ancient Russia as Magi was carried out. Historiography and source study of this issue allowed the author to determine the contribution of his predecessors who were interested in this issue and to identify main contradictions on the Magi phenomenon. The article provides a rationale for historical and ideological necessity of analyzing ideas about man and the world as a system that functioned in the ancient Russian state. The period before the Christianization of Rus’ is understudied, and, at the same time, paganism (including the institute of priesthood, to which many think Magi belong) was the official and predominant religion among the Eastern Slavs until the Christianization of Rus’ in 988. The author is of the view that there should be continuity of all periods of the national history of Rus’-Russia, and it is necessary to reflect both bright and heroic events, and those kept secret for ideological reasons.","PeriodicalId":145879,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2022.39.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the comparative and historical method, hermeneutics, anthropology and ethnography, and the principle of objectivity, the analysis of such social group of Ancient Russia as Magi was carried out. Historiography and source study of this issue allowed the author to determine the contribution of his predecessors who were interested in this issue and to identify main contradictions on the Magi phenomenon. The article provides a rationale for historical and ideological necessity of analyzing ideas about man and the world as a system that functioned in the ancient Russian state. The period before the Christianization of Rus’ is understudied, and, at the same time, paganism (including the institute of priesthood, to which many think Magi belong) was the official and predominant religion among the Eastern Slavs until the Christianization of Rus’ in 988. The author is of the view that there should be continuity of all periods of the national history of Rus’-Russia, and it is necessary to reflect both bright and heroic events, and those kept secret for ideological reasons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东方贤士是古代俄罗斯的祭司吗?
运用比较史学方法、诠释学方法、人类学和民族志方法以及客观性原则,对古代俄罗斯的魔法师这一社会群体进行了分析。对这一问题的史学研究和史料研究使作者能够确定对这一问题感兴趣的前人的贡献,并确定贤士现象的主要矛盾。本文为分析作为一个系统的人与世界观念在古代俄罗斯国家中发挥作用的历史和思想必要性提供了理论基础。在罗斯基督教化之前的时期没有得到充分的研究,与此同时,在988年罗斯基督教化之前,异教(包括许多人认为东方贤士所属的祭司制度)是东斯拉夫人的官方和主要宗教。作者认为,罗斯-俄罗斯民族历史的各个时期都应该有连续性,既要反映光明的、英雄的事件,也要反映由于意识形态原因而被隐瞒的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Late M. M. Speransky's Intellectual Service to Russia: Between Ideals and Political Reality Criteria of Authenticity as the Methodology for Assessing Historical Reliability of a Gospel Text Towards a Religious Community Towards the Sovereignization of Social Science: Notes in the Margins of an Editorial Ivan the Terrible – the First Publicist and Political Strategist on the Moscow Throne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1