From Here to Eternity: The Folly of Perpetual Trusts

Lawrence W. Waggoner
{"title":"From Here to Eternity: The Folly of Perpetual Trusts","authors":"Lawrence W. Waggoner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1975117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a country that is only 240 years old, trusts that can last for as many as 1000 years or even forever, typically for the benefit of the settlor’s descendants living from time to time, now and in the future, are all the rage in banking and estate-planning circles. Before 1986, when Congress passed the federal generation-skipping transfer tax (GST tax), settlors had little incentive and probably little desire to establish perpetual trusts, even though they were permitted to do so under the law of Wisconsin, South Dakota, or Idaho. The GST tax created an artificial incentive for the wealthy to establish such trusts. The origin of the perpetual-trust movement is the GST exemption, which is part of the GST tax. When Congress granted the GST exemption, it did not impose a durational limit on trusts that qualify for the exemption, but instead relied on state perpetuity laws to supply that limit. The reliance on state perpetuity laws was badly misplaced. At the instigation of state banking groups and estate-planning attorneys, states began to pass legislation allowing trust settlors to create perpetual trusts — trusts that can last for several centuries or even forever. With state perpetuity laws out of the way, the wealthy began creating perpetual trusts in significant numbers. This essay questions whether the state legislators who vote to authorize perpetual trusts and the wealthy who create them are thinking through what they are allowing or putting in place. The essay shows the folly of such trusts, primarily by producing a table projecting how, with each step down the generational ladder, the number of beneficiaries will proliferate and the settlor’s genetic connection with the beneficiaries will decline. The essay then points out that the primary responsibility for the perpetual-trust movement rests not with the state legislators or the wealthy, but with Congress. The primary responsibility for curtailing it also rests with Congress, but so far Congress has been decidedly uninterested in fixing what it instigated.","PeriodicalId":415088,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Law & Economics: Law Faculty Papers (Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Law & Economics: Law Faculty Papers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1975117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In a country that is only 240 years old, trusts that can last for as many as 1000 years or even forever, typically for the benefit of the settlor’s descendants living from time to time, now and in the future, are all the rage in banking and estate-planning circles. Before 1986, when Congress passed the federal generation-skipping transfer tax (GST tax), settlors had little incentive and probably little desire to establish perpetual trusts, even though they were permitted to do so under the law of Wisconsin, South Dakota, or Idaho. The GST tax created an artificial incentive for the wealthy to establish such trusts. The origin of the perpetual-trust movement is the GST exemption, which is part of the GST tax. When Congress granted the GST exemption, it did not impose a durational limit on trusts that qualify for the exemption, but instead relied on state perpetuity laws to supply that limit. The reliance on state perpetuity laws was badly misplaced. At the instigation of state banking groups and estate-planning attorneys, states began to pass legislation allowing trust settlors to create perpetual trusts — trusts that can last for several centuries or even forever. With state perpetuity laws out of the way, the wealthy began creating perpetual trusts in significant numbers. This essay questions whether the state legislators who vote to authorize perpetual trusts and the wealthy who create them are thinking through what they are allowing or putting in place. The essay shows the folly of such trusts, primarily by producing a table projecting how, with each step down the generational ladder, the number of beneficiaries will proliferate and the settlor’s genetic connection with the beneficiaries will decline. The essay then points out that the primary responsibility for the perpetual-trust movement rests not with the state legislators or the wealthy, but with Congress. The primary responsibility for curtailing it also rests with Congress, but so far Congress has been decidedly uninterested in fixing what it instigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从现在到永恒:永久信托的愚蠢
在一个只有240年历史的国家,可以持续1000年甚至永远的信托,通常是为了现在和将来不时生活的定居者的后代的利益,在银行业和遗产规划界风靡一时。1986年,国会通过了联邦跨代转让税(GST税),在此之前,尽管威斯康辛州、南达科他州和爱达荷州的法律允许定居者建立永久信托,但定居者几乎没有动力,也可能没有意愿建立永久信托。商品及服务税人为地激励富人建立这样的信托。永久信托运动的起源是商品及服务税的豁免,这是商品及服务税的一部分。当国会批准GST豁免时,它并没有对有资格获得豁免的信托施加期限限制,而是依靠州永续法来提供这一限制。对州永续法的依赖严重错位。在州银行集团和遗产规划律师的鼓动下,各州开始通过立法,允许信托受托人创建永久信托——可以持续几个世纪甚至永远的信托。随着州永续财产法的废除,富人开始大量创建永续财产信托。本文质疑投票授权永久信托的州议员和创建永久信托的富人是否仔细考虑过他们允许或实施的事情。这篇文章展示了这种信托的愚蠢之处,主要是通过制作一个表格来预测,随着代际阶梯的每一步,受益人的数量将如何激增,而遗产继承人与受益人的遗传联系将如何下降。文章接着指出,永久信托运动的主要责任不在于州议员或富人,而在于国会。削减赤字的主要责任也在国会,但到目前为止,国会显然对解决它所煽动的问题不感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exclusion from Income of Compensation for Services and Pooling of Labor Occurring in a Noncommercial Setting A Comprehensive Approach to the Capital Requirements Based on EVA Taxes in the Time of Coronavirus: Is It Time to Revive the Excess Profits Tax? If Not Now, When? US Tax Treaties with Latin America after TCJA The Promotion of Financial Inclusion in Madagascar Through Mobile Money and Microfinance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1