{"title":"A philosophy of childhood","authors":"G. Matthews, Amy Mullin","doi":"10.2307/431808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So many questions, such an imagination, endless speculation: the child seems to be a natural philosopher - until the ripe old age of eight or nine, when the spirit of inquiry mysteriously fades. What happened? Was it something we did - or didn't do? Was the child truly the philosophical being he once seemed? Gareth Matthews takes up these concerns in \"The Philosophy of Childhood\", an account of children's philosophical potential and of childhood as an area of philosophical inquiry. Seeking a philosophy that represents the range and depth of children's inquisitive minds, Matthews explores both how children think and how we, as adults, think about them. Adult preconceptions about the mental life of children tend to discourage a child's philosophical bent, Matthews suggests, and he probes the sources of these limiting assumptions: restrictive notions of maturation and conceptual development; possible lapses in episodic memory; and the experience of identity and growth as \"successive selves\", which separate us from our own childhoods. By exposing the underpinnings of our adult views of childhood, Matthews, a philosopher and long time advocate of children's rights, clears the way for recognizing the philosophy of childhood as a legitimate field of inquiry. He then conducts us through various influential models for understanding what it is to be a child, from the theory that individual development recapitulates the development of the human species to accounts of moral and cognitive development, including Piaget's revolutionary model. The metaphysics of playdough, the authenticity of children's art, the effects of divorce and intimations of mortality on a child - all have a place in Matthews's discussion of the philosophical nature of childhood. His book should prompt us to reconsider the distinctions we make about development and the competencies of mind, and what we lose by denying childhood its full philosophical breadth.","PeriodicalId":402015,"journal":{"name":"Gareth B. Matthews, The Child's Philosopher","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gareth B. Matthews, The Child's Philosopher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/431808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79
Abstract
So many questions, such an imagination, endless speculation: the child seems to be a natural philosopher - until the ripe old age of eight or nine, when the spirit of inquiry mysteriously fades. What happened? Was it something we did - or didn't do? Was the child truly the philosophical being he once seemed? Gareth Matthews takes up these concerns in "The Philosophy of Childhood", an account of children's philosophical potential and of childhood as an area of philosophical inquiry. Seeking a philosophy that represents the range and depth of children's inquisitive minds, Matthews explores both how children think and how we, as adults, think about them. Adult preconceptions about the mental life of children tend to discourage a child's philosophical bent, Matthews suggests, and he probes the sources of these limiting assumptions: restrictive notions of maturation and conceptual development; possible lapses in episodic memory; and the experience of identity and growth as "successive selves", which separate us from our own childhoods. By exposing the underpinnings of our adult views of childhood, Matthews, a philosopher and long time advocate of children's rights, clears the way for recognizing the philosophy of childhood as a legitimate field of inquiry. He then conducts us through various influential models for understanding what it is to be a child, from the theory that individual development recapitulates the development of the human species to accounts of moral and cognitive development, including Piaget's revolutionary model. The metaphysics of playdough, the authenticity of children's art, the effects of divorce and intimations of mortality on a child - all have a place in Matthews's discussion of the philosophical nature of childhood. His book should prompt us to reconsider the distinctions we make about development and the competencies of mind, and what we lose by denying childhood its full philosophical breadth.
如此多的问题,如此丰富的想象力,无尽的猜测:孩子似乎是一个天生的哲学家——直到八、九岁的成熟年龄,探究的精神神秘地消失了。发生了什么事?是我们做了什么,还是没做什么?这个孩子真的是他曾经看起来的那个哲人吗?加雷思·马修斯(Gareth Matthews)在《童年哲学》(The Philosophy of Childhood)一书中探讨了这些问题,该书讲述了儿童的哲学潜力,并将童年作为哲学探究的一个领域。马修斯寻求一种代表儿童好奇思维的广度和深度的哲学,探索儿童如何思考以及我们作为成年人如何看待他们。马修斯认为,成人对儿童精神生活的先入之见往往会阻碍儿童的哲学倾向,他探讨了这些限制性假设的来源:成熟和概念发展的限制性概念;情景记忆的可能缺失;以及作为“连续自我”的身份认同和成长经历,这将我们与自己的童年分开。长期倡导儿童权利的哲学家马修斯,通过揭露我们成年人对童年的基本看法,为承认童年哲学是一个合法的研究领域扫清了道路。然后,他引导我们通过各种有影响力的模型来理解儿童是什么,从个人发展概括人类物种发展的理论到道德和认知发展的解释,包括皮亚杰的革命性模型。橡皮泥的形而上学,儿童艺术的真实性,离婚对孩子的影响以及死亡对孩子的暗示——这些都在马修斯对童年哲学本质的讨论中占有一席之地。他的书应该促使我们重新考虑我们对发展和心智能力所做的区分,以及否认童年的完整哲学广度所带来的损失。