The Hierarchy of the Offshore US-Dollar System. On Swap Lines, the FIMA Repo Facility and Special Drawing Rights

Steffen Murau, Fabian Pape, Tobias Pforr
{"title":"The Hierarchy of the Offshore US-Dollar System. On Swap Lines, the FIMA Repo Facility and Special Drawing Rights","authors":"Steffen Murau, Fabian Pape, Tobias Pforr","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3780794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it has become common to regard the international monetary system as hierarchical, the nature, shape and origin of this hierarchy often remain vague. \n \nTaking on board insights of critical macro-finance, this study from the Global Economic Governance Initiative at the Global Development Policy Center conceptualizes international monetary hierarchy by focusing on different mechanisms to supply emergency US-Dollar (USD) liquidity from the Federal Reserve (Fed) to non-US central banks and develops a model of the global financial architecture as a web of hierarchical interlocking balance sheets. \n \nThe model perceives today’s international monetary system as an ‘Offshore USD System,’ as it is based on using and creating USD-denominated credit money instruments ‘offshore’, i.e. outside the US. The centrality of the USD as global ‘key currency’ places the US monetary jurisdiction at the apex and pushes all other monetary jurisdictions into a peripheral position. While private credit money creation is the default mechanism in normal times, central banks become paramount when private credit money instruments are about to endogenously implode in a crisis. The mechanisms through which non-US central banks can access emergency USD liquidity from the Fed determine the international hierarchy below the apex. \n \nCurrently, there are three different mechanisms for non-US central banks to access the Fed’s balance sheet to attain emergency USD liquidity: the Fed’s central bank swap lines, the Fed’s new repo facility for Foreign and International Monetary Authorities (FIMA), and the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) system administered by the International Monetary Fund. \n \nThese mechanisms create three peripheral layers in the Offshore USD System. Not only do they matter when they are actually used in systemic crises, but also during normal times. Peripheral monetary jurisdictions that are higher up in the international hierarchy receive a more flexible and inexpensive implicit liquidity guarantee that increases their banking systems’ elasticity space.","PeriodicalId":355111,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3780794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

While it has become common to regard the international monetary system as hierarchical, the nature, shape and origin of this hierarchy often remain vague. Taking on board insights of critical macro-finance, this study from the Global Economic Governance Initiative at the Global Development Policy Center conceptualizes international monetary hierarchy by focusing on different mechanisms to supply emergency US-Dollar (USD) liquidity from the Federal Reserve (Fed) to non-US central banks and develops a model of the global financial architecture as a web of hierarchical interlocking balance sheets. The model perceives today’s international monetary system as an ‘Offshore USD System,’ as it is based on using and creating USD-denominated credit money instruments ‘offshore’, i.e. outside the US. The centrality of the USD as global ‘key currency’ places the US monetary jurisdiction at the apex and pushes all other monetary jurisdictions into a peripheral position. While private credit money creation is the default mechanism in normal times, central banks become paramount when private credit money instruments are about to endogenously implode in a crisis. The mechanisms through which non-US central banks can access emergency USD liquidity from the Fed determine the international hierarchy below the apex. Currently, there are three different mechanisms for non-US central banks to access the Fed’s balance sheet to attain emergency USD liquidity: the Fed’s central bank swap lines, the Fed’s new repo facility for Foreign and International Monetary Authorities (FIMA), and the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) system administered by the International Monetary Fund. These mechanisms create three peripheral layers in the Offshore USD System. Not only do they matter when they are actually used in systemic crises, but also during normal times. Peripheral monetary jurisdictions that are higher up in the international hierarchy receive a more flexible and inexpensive implicit liquidity guarantee that increases their banking systems’ elasticity space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离岸美元体系的等级制度。在互换额度、FIMA回购机制和特别提款权方面
虽然普遍认为国际货币制度是等级制度,但这种等级制度的性质、形式和起源往往是模糊的。全球发展政策中心全球经济治理倡议(Global Economic Governance Initiative)的这项研究吸收了关键宏观金融的见解,通过关注从美联储(Fed)向非美国央行提供紧急美元流动性的不同机制,对国际货币等级进行了概念化,并建立了一个全球金融架构模型,将其视为一个等级环环相扣的资产负债表网络。该模型将当今的国际货币体系视为“离岸美元体系”,因为它基于在“离岸”(即在美国境外)使用和创造美元计价的信贷货币工具。美元作为全球“关键货币”的中心地位将美国的货币管辖权置于顶端,而将所有其他货币管辖权推至外围位置。虽然私人信贷货币创造在正常时期是违约机制,但当私人信贷货币工具即将在危机中发生内爆时,央行就变得至关重要。非美国央行可以从美联储获得紧急美元流动性的机制,决定了顶层以下的国际层级。目前,非美国中央银行有三种不同的机制可以进入美联储的资产负债表,以获得紧急美元流动性:美联储的央行互换额度,美联储针对外国和国际货币当局的新回购工具(FIMA),以及由国际货币基金组织管理的特别提款权(SDR)系统。这些机制在离岸美元系统中创建了三个外围层。它们不仅在系统性危机中实际使用时很重要,在正常时期也很重要。外围货币司法管辖区,在国际等级较高,获得更灵活和廉价的隐性流动性保证,增加其银行体系的弹性空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Transmission of Euro Area Monetary Policy to Financially Euroised Countries Household Indebtedness and the Consumption Channel of Monetary Policy: Evidence from China Measuring Monetary Policy Shocks in India Technology Adoption and the Bank Lending Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission Modeling Monopoly Money: Government as the Source of the Price Level and Unemployment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1