Monitoring negative opinion about vaccines from tweets analysis

Eleonora D'Andrea, P. Ducange, F. Marcelloni
{"title":"Monitoring negative opinion about vaccines from tweets analysis","authors":"Eleonora D'Andrea, P. Ducange, F. Marcelloni","doi":"10.1109/ICRCICN.2017.8234504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present an approach to monitor the Italian public opinion from tweets analysis, with reference to the vaccination topic. This topic has recently become controversial, due to the disinformation about the alleged connection between autism and vaccines. Further, the Italian Ministry of Health has noticed a drop in vaccination rates, enhancing the risk of reemergence of eradicated diseases. Thus, a system to monitor the negative public opinion about vaccines could become very important for decision making. The proposed approach i) fetches vaccine-related tweets, ii) applies a text elaboration on the tweets, and iii) performs a binary classification aimed at discriminating negative opinions tweets (i.e., not in favor of vaccination) from the rest of tweets. By employing the Simple Logistic classifier, we achieved a 75.5% average accuracy. Finally, we monitor the trend over time of public opinion about vaccination decision making in a free, real-time and quick fashion.","PeriodicalId":166298,"journal":{"name":"2017 Third International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN)","volume":"268 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Third International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRCICN.2017.8234504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we present an approach to monitor the Italian public opinion from tweets analysis, with reference to the vaccination topic. This topic has recently become controversial, due to the disinformation about the alleged connection between autism and vaccines. Further, the Italian Ministry of Health has noticed a drop in vaccination rates, enhancing the risk of reemergence of eradicated diseases. Thus, a system to monitor the negative public opinion about vaccines could become very important for decision making. The proposed approach i) fetches vaccine-related tweets, ii) applies a text elaboration on the tweets, and iii) performs a binary classification aimed at discriminating negative opinions tweets (i.e., not in favor of vaccination) from the rest of tweets. By employing the Simple Logistic classifier, we achieved a 75.5% average accuracy. Finally, we monitor the trend over time of public opinion about vaccination decision making in a free, real-time and quick fashion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从推文分析中监测对疫苗的负面意见
在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来监测意大利公众舆论从推特分析,参考疫苗接种的话题。由于有关自闭症和疫苗之间所谓联系的虚假信息,这个话题最近变得有争议。此外,意大利卫生部注意到疫苗接种率有所下降,这增加了已根除疾病重新出现的风险。因此,监测公众对疫苗的负面意见的系统可能对决策非常重要。所提出的方法i)获取与疫苗相关的推文,ii)对推文进行文本细化,以及iii)执行二元分类,旨在区分负面意见推文(即不赞成接种疫苗)与其他推文。通过使用简单逻辑分类器,我们达到了75.5%的平均准确率。最后,我们以免费、实时、快速的方式监测疫苗接种决策的公众舆论趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RGB image encryption using hyper chaotic system Characterisation of wireless network traffic: Fractality and stationarity Security risk assessment in online social networking: A detailed survey Optimalized hydel-thermic operative planning using IRECGA Designing an enhanced ZRP algorithm for MANET and simulation using OPNET
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1