Misplaced of Intrauterine Devices: The Endoscopic Management

K. Bouras, C. Bentabet, K. Saoud, N. Mamouni, S. Erraghay, C. Bouchikhi, A. Banani
{"title":"Misplaced of Intrauterine Devices: The Endoscopic Management","authors":"K. Bouras, C. Bentabet, K. Saoud, N. Mamouni, S. Erraghay, C. Bouchikhi, A. Banani","doi":"10.36349/easjms.2023.v05i04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra uterine device migration is a relatively rare event. The migration of the IUD in the surrounded viscera can be managed by endoscopy approach. Objectives: We reported our experience to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of patients that presented migrated IUD, to report clinical aspects and describe the laparoscopic management. Method: The study includes 10 patients reported to obstetrics and Gynecology I department of UHC Hassan II FES in the last 4 years (2018-2021). In all the patients a gynecological examination, ultrasound evaluation abdomen and pelvis were done to locate the misplaced IUD. If the device was found to be intrauterine, hysteroscopy was done to locate and retrieve device. In those patients in whom the IUD was confirmed to be extrauterine diagnostic laparoscopy was done. Results: The average of age was 34.5 years. Majority of patients were primipara (53.3%) and 46.6% were multipara. As far as timing of insertion is concerned 6 (60%) were postpartum, 4 (40%) were postmenstrual. The average of time interval between insertion and removal is 3, 12 years. Of the 10 misplaced intrauterine devices 4 were found partially embedded in uterine wall and 6 of the misplaced 1UD’s were found deeply embedded in the uterine cavity. After their location they were removed hysteroscopically One patient reported with 8 weeks pregnancy and misplaced IUD. The device was confirmed to be intrauterine on transvaginal sonography. She had full term normal delivery and IUD was removed after 6 weeks hysteroscopically. None of our patient had an extra uterine migration that required a laparoscopy.","PeriodicalId":446681,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjms.2023.v05i04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intra uterine device migration is a relatively rare event. The migration of the IUD in the surrounded viscera can be managed by endoscopy approach. Objectives: We reported our experience to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of patients that presented migrated IUD, to report clinical aspects and describe the laparoscopic management. Method: The study includes 10 patients reported to obstetrics and Gynecology I department of UHC Hassan II FES in the last 4 years (2018-2021). In all the patients a gynecological examination, ultrasound evaluation abdomen and pelvis were done to locate the misplaced IUD. If the device was found to be intrauterine, hysteroscopy was done to locate and retrieve device. In those patients in whom the IUD was confirmed to be extrauterine diagnostic laparoscopy was done. Results: The average of age was 34.5 years. Majority of patients were primipara (53.3%) and 46.6% were multipara. As far as timing of insertion is concerned 6 (60%) were postpartum, 4 (40%) were postmenstrual. The average of time interval between insertion and removal is 3, 12 years. Of the 10 misplaced intrauterine devices 4 were found partially embedded in uterine wall and 6 of the misplaced 1UD’s were found deeply embedded in the uterine cavity. After their location they were removed hysteroscopically One patient reported with 8 weeks pregnancy and misplaced IUD. The device was confirmed to be intrauterine on transvaginal sonography. She had full term normal delivery and IUD was removed after 6 weeks hysteroscopically. None of our patient had an extra uterine migration that required a laparoscopy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫内节育器放错位置的内镜处理
子宫内装置移位是一个相对罕见的事件。宫内节育器在周围脏器内的移动可以通过内窥镜方法进行处理。目的:我们报告了我们的经验,以确定出现宫内节育器移位的患者的流行病学特征,报告临床方面和描述腹腔镜管理。方法:选取近4年(2018-2021年)在全民健康覆盖哈桑二世FES妇产科就诊的10例患者为研究对象。所有患者均行妇科检查、腹部和骨盆超声检查以定位放置的宫内节育器。如果发现装置在宫内,宫腔镜检查定位并取出装置。在确认宫内节育器为宫外诊断的患者行腹腔镜检查。结果:患者平均年龄34.5岁。初产妇占53.3%,多产妇占46.6%。就插入时间而言,产后6例(60%),经后4例(40%)。插入和取出的平均时间间隔为3、12年。放置的10个宫内节育器中4个部分嵌入子宫壁,6个放置的宫内节育器深度嵌入子宫腔。1例患者报告妊娠8周,宫内节育器放错位置。经阴道超声检查证实该装置为宫内装置。她足月正常分娩,6周宫腔镜下取出宫内节育器。我们的病人都没有需要腹腔镜检查的额外子宫移位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacteremias in Intensive Care Unit: A Two-Year Retrospective Study Early Puerperium Gangrenous Sigmoid Volvulus: Case Report Respiratory Distress in Children Aged 6 to 59 Months at the Pediatric Department of the Csref of Commune V of Bamako: Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Incidence, Risk Factors and Mortality of COVID-19 among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis Heartache to Happiness: Managing a Six Year Hormonal Subfertility with a Successful Rate of Conception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1