Corpus Cleanup of Mistaken Agreement Using Word Sense Disambiguation

Abstract

Word sense annotated corpora are useful resources for many text mining applications. Such corpora are only useful if their annotations are consistent. Most large-scale annotation efforts take special measures to reconcile inter-annotator disagreement. To date, however, nobody has investigated how to automatically determine exemplars in which the annotators agree but are wrong. In this paper, we use OntoNotes, a large-scale corpus of semantic annotations, including word senses, predicate-argument structure, ontology linking, and coreference. To determine the mistaken agreements in word sense annotation, we employ word sense disambiguation (WSD) to select a set of suspicious candidates for human evaluation. Experiments are conducted from three aspects (precision, cost-effectiveness ratio, and entropy) to examine the performance of WSD. The experimental results show that WSD is most effective in identifying erroneous annotations for highly-ambiguous words, while a baseline is better for other cases. The two methods can be combined to improve the cleanup process. This procedure allows us to find approximately 2% of the remaining erroneous agreements in the OntoNotes corpus. A similar procedure can be easily defined to check other annotated corpora.