Rubrics as a Tool for Objective Assessment in Art Education

Austra Avotiņa, Valeria Froloviceva
{"title":"Rubrics as a Tool for Objective Assessment in Art Education","authors":"Austra Avotiņa, Valeria Froloviceva","doi":"10.22364/atee.2022.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes the importance of a rubric as an assessment tool in art education. The assessment of a work of art, for example, a landscape or a portrait painting usually consists of a combination of objective information and a subjective point of view, which makes it difficult for educators to assess students’ learning outcomes. The use of rubrics is considered an innovative way for educators not only to measure the student’s comprehension and skills but also as a teaching method to increase learners’ engagement in order to bring the creation of art to the forefront of the learning process within school art education. The relevance of the subject of this paper is defined by the changes in the evaluation system during the ongoing education reform in Latvia. The rubric, as an assessment tool in Latvia, was first introduced in 2020 as a part of the reform of the school curriculum. Rubrics for creative art assignments observe the main stages of the learning process, including sketching, expression of original ideas, creative work, documentation of the creation process and self-evaluation. It can be used for both, summative and formative assessments of learning outcomes. The criteria are based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Visual Literacy which was developed by The European Network of Visual Literacy. Therefore, the research aim is to determine the optimal way to evaluate students’ work in art lessons within the framework of school art education. The research involved two stages of data collection. During the first stage (2021) there was conducted a survey of 60 Latvian secondary school teachers that identified several problematic issues concerning the evaluation criteria. In the second stage (2022) the in-depth analysis was performed to investigate the connection between the feedback from educational practice and recommended rubrics in new curricula.","PeriodicalId":286803,"journal":{"name":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","volume":"421 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper describes the importance of a rubric as an assessment tool in art education. The assessment of a work of art, for example, a landscape or a portrait painting usually consists of a combination of objective information and a subjective point of view, which makes it difficult for educators to assess students’ learning outcomes. The use of rubrics is considered an innovative way for educators not only to measure the student’s comprehension and skills but also as a teaching method to increase learners’ engagement in order to bring the creation of art to the forefront of the learning process within school art education. The relevance of the subject of this paper is defined by the changes in the evaluation system during the ongoing education reform in Latvia. The rubric, as an assessment tool in Latvia, was first introduced in 2020 as a part of the reform of the school curriculum. Rubrics for creative art assignments observe the main stages of the learning process, including sketching, expression of original ideas, creative work, documentation of the creation process and self-evaluation. It can be used for both, summative and formative assessments of learning outcomes. The criteria are based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Visual Literacy which was developed by The European Network of Visual Literacy. Therefore, the research aim is to determine the optimal way to evaluate students’ work in art lessons within the framework of school art education. The research involved two stages of data collection. During the first stage (2021) there was conducted a survey of 60 Latvian secondary school teachers that identified several problematic issues concerning the evaluation criteria. In the second stage (2022) the in-depth analysis was performed to investigate the connection between the feedback from educational practice and recommended rubrics in new curricula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艺术教育中客观评价的标准
本文描述了在艺术教育中,作为一种评估工具的评分标准的重要性。对一件艺术作品的评估,例如一幅风景画或一幅肖像画,通常包括客观信息和主观观点的结合,这使得教育者很难评估学生的学习成果。对教育者来说,使用标尺是一种创新的方式,不仅可以衡量学生的理解能力和技能,而且可以作为一种提高学习者参与度的教学方法,以便在学校艺术教育中将艺术创作置于学习过程的最前沿。本文主题的相关性是由拉脱维亚正在进行的教育改革期间评估体系的变化所定义的。该标准作为拉脱维亚的一种评估工具,于2020年首次作为学校课程改革的一部分引入。创意艺术作业的规则观察学习过程的主要阶段,包括素描,表达原创思想,创造性工作,创作过程的文档和自我评价。它既可用于学习成果的总结性评估,也可用于形成性评估。这些标准是基于欧洲视觉素养网络制定的《欧洲共同视觉素养参考框架》。因此,本研究的目的是在学校艺术教育的框架内,确定评估学生美术课作业的最佳方法。这项研究包括两个阶段的数据收集。在第一阶段(2021年),对60名拉脱维亚中学教师进行了调查,发现了与评估标准有关的几个问题。在第二阶段(2022年),进行了深入分析,以调查教育实践反馈与新课程推荐规则之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indicators of Social Emotional Health (SEHS-T) and Resilience in the Latvian Teachers’ Sample Focusing on Arts Education from the Perspectives of Well-Being The Impact of Additional Sports Activities on the Development of Students in General Education Schools Integrating Computational Thinking into Classroom Practice: A Case Study Teacher Creator: Practices of Creating Educational Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1