Proposition of a new collaborative method to study the concept of absorptive capacity

J. D. Benedittis, F. Movahedian, Armelle Farastier, A. Front, C. Dominguez-Péry
{"title":"Proposition of a new collaborative method to study the concept of absorptive capacity","authors":"J. D. Benedittis, F. Movahedian, Armelle Farastier, A. Front, C. Dominguez-Péry","doi":"10.9876/SIM.V23I3.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Absorptive capacity (ACAP) is considered as a dynamic capability based on organisational routines and practices. In information systems, and more generally in management science, most of the current methodological approaches cannot describe these routines and practices on a micro level. This paper presents the research methods that are usually used to study the concept of ACAP. By comparing these methods, we identify their limits and we provide the guidelines to apply a new collaborative research method called ISEACAP (Identification, Simulation, Evaluation, Assimilation of ACAP practices). This method follows a “practice-based” perspective and relies more specifically on the co-creation of new knowledge from both practitioners and researchers. ISEACAP is a gamified participative method to study ACAP’s practices in more depth. This paper presents ISEACAP as a new research method that entails a reflexive disposition from the practitioners about their practices and allows researchers to better understand ACAP mechanisms. Moreover, the method facilitates the study of mobilised organisational routines and practices (consciously or unconsciously) by actors to create and develop any kind of dynamic capabilities.","PeriodicalId":220138,"journal":{"name":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9876/SIM.V23I3.824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Absorptive capacity (ACAP) is considered as a dynamic capability based on organisational routines and practices. In information systems, and more generally in management science, most of the current methodological approaches cannot describe these routines and practices on a micro level. This paper presents the research methods that are usually used to study the concept of ACAP. By comparing these methods, we identify their limits and we provide the guidelines to apply a new collaborative research method called ISEACAP (Identification, Simulation, Evaluation, Assimilation of ACAP practices). This method follows a “practice-based” perspective and relies more specifically on the co-creation of new knowledge from both practitioners and researchers. ISEACAP is a gamified participative method to study ACAP’s practices in more depth. This paper presents ISEACAP as a new research method that entails a reflexive disposition from the practitioners about their practices and allows researchers to better understand ACAP mechanisms. Moreover, the method facilitates the study of mobilised organisational routines and practices (consciously or unconsciously) by actors to create and develop any kind of dynamic capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提出一种新的协同研究吸收能力概念的方法
吸收能力(ACAP)被认为是一种基于组织惯例和实践的动态能力。在信息系统中,更广泛地说,在管理科学中,大多数当前的方法不能在微观层面上描述这些惯例和实践。本文介绍了通常用于研究ACAP概念的研究方法。通过比较这些方法,我们确定了它们的局限性,并提供了应用一种新的合作研究方法ISEACAP(识别,模拟,评估,同化ACAP实践)的指导方针。这种方法遵循“基于实践”的观点,更具体地依赖于实践者和研究人员共同创造新知识。isacap是一种游戏化的参与式方法,可以更深入地研究ACAP的实践。本文提出了isacap作为一种新的研究方法,它需要实践者对其实践的反思倾向,使研究者能够更好地理解ACAP的机制。此外,该方法促进了参与者(有意识或无意识地)对动员组织惯例和实践的研究,以创造和发展任何类型的动态能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pros and Cons of IoT Use: What can they tell us with respect to Business Model Change? Business Model Research in the Information Systems Literature: A Review and a Research Agenda Open Source Companies’ Absorptive Capacity: from Business Model to Business Intention The Crowdfunding Paradox: the Underuse of Crowd in the Individual Investment Decision-Making Factory The symbolic interpretation of enterprise social networks as a brake on their adoption within one French banking group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1