The Identification of Student Misconceptions on the Concept of Electricity Using the CRI Decision Matrix Three Level Test

Muhammad Azzarkasyi, S. Rizal, Kasmawati Kasmawati
{"title":"The Identification of Student Misconceptions on the Concept of Electricity Using the CRI Decision Matrix Three Level Test","authors":"Muhammad Azzarkasyi, S. Rizal, Kasmawati Kasmawati","doi":"10.24815/AJSE.V1I1.14614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the percentage of students who experience misconceptions (MIS), know the concept (KCC), do not know the concept (LK), Guess (LG), and not confidence (NC) in learning electricity concepts; in what subconcepts students experience misconceptions and what causes misconceptions. The object of the research was the first-level D-III students of Radiology Engineering in the first semester of the 2016/2017 school year who contracted the Basic Physics course. The study was conducted in November 2016. The method used is descriptive method. In this study the CRI Three-Tier Test decision matrix is used to identify student misconceptions. Identification is done by using a structured choice diagnostic test that is equipped with an index of student confidence in the test answers and also equipped with a column of reasons from the answers given by students. To find out the cause of the misconception conducted interviews. The results of CRI diagnostic data analysis showed that of the 37 students who were the object of research it was found that as many as 26.35% did not know the concept (LK), 20.95% knew the concept (KCC) where the students were in accordance with scientific conceptions, 0.51% students guessed LG), 40.88% of students experienced misconceptions (Mis), and 11.32% of answers to students who were not confident (NC). The highest percentage of misconception was found in the sub-principle of ohm's legal concept (41.08%), kirchhoff's legal sub-concept (41.89%) and sub-basic concepts of electric and parallel circuits (40.54%). The results of the interviews showed that the causes of the misconceptions included the character of abstract electrical concepts, lack of understanding of the concept, difficulty analyzing the sequence, and the unpreparedness of students to accept material delivered by the lecturer.","PeriodicalId":138020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Science Education","volume":"379 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/AJSE.V1I1.14614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the percentage of students who experience misconceptions (MIS), know the concept (KCC), do not know the concept (LK), Guess (LG), and not confidence (NC) in learning electricity concepts; in what subconcepts students experience misconceptions and what causes misconceptions. The object of the research was the first-level D-III students of Radiology Engineering in the first semester of the 2016/2017 school year who contracted the Basic Physics course. The study was conducted in November 2016. The method used is descriptive method. In this study the CRI Three-Tier Test decision matrix is used to identify student misconceptions. Identification is done by using a structured choice diagnostic test that is equipped with an index of student confidence in the test answers and also equipped with a column of reasons from the answers given by students. To find out the cause of the misconception conducted interviews. The results of CRI diagnostic data analysis showed that of the 37 students who were the object of research it was found that as many as 26.35% did not know the concept (LK), 20.95% knew the concept (KCC) where the students were in accordance with scientific conceptions, 0.51% students guessed LG), 40.88% of students experienced misconceptions (Mis), and 11.32% of answers to students who were not confident (NC). The highest percentage of misconception was found in the sub-principle of ohm's legal concept (41.08%), kirchhoff's legal sub-concept (41.89%) and sub-basic concepts of electric and parallel circuits (40.54%). The results of the interviews showed that the causes of the misconceptions included the character of abstract electrical concepts, lack of understanding of the concept, difficulty analyzing the sequence, and the unpreparedness of students to accept material delivered by the lecturer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用CRI决策矩阵三级测验识别学生对电力概念的误解
本研究的目的是确定学生在学习电概念时经历误解(MIS)、知道概念(KCC)、不知道概念(LK)、猜测(LG)和不自信(NC)的百分比;学生在哪些子概念中会产生误解,是什么导致了误解。本研究对象为2016/2017学年上学期签约基础物理课程的放射学工程专业D-III级一级学生。该研究于2016年11月进行。使用的方法是描述性方法。在本研究中,使用CRI三层测试决策矩阵来识别学生的误解。识别是通过使用结构化选择诊断测试来完成的,该测试配备了学生对测试答案的信心指数,也配备了学生给出答案的原因栏。为了找出误解的原因进行了采访。CRI诊断数据分析结果显示,在研究对象的37名学生中,发现多达26.35%的学生不知道概念(LK), 20.95%的学生知道概念(KCC),其中学生符合科学概念,0.51%的学生猜测LG), 40.88%的学生经历了误解(Mis), 11.32%的学生回答不自信(NC)。误解比例最高的是欧姆法律概念的子原理(41.08%)、基尔霍夫法律概念的子概念(41.89%)和电气和并联电路的子基本概念(40.54%)。访谈结果表明,造成误解的原因包括抽象电概念的特点、对概念的理解不足、分析顺序困难以及学生对讲师所提供的材料没有准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Student Worksheets Based Inquiry using PhET Simulations to Enhance the Curiosity Attitude of High School Students Analysis of Sciences Process Skills of Science Education Students in Microbiology Practice The Development of Science Teaching Materials Based on Android Mobile to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in Junior High School Students Development of a Laboratory-based Physics Module with a Science Process Skills Approach to enhance the interest of High School Students PhET’s Photoelectric Effect Simulation: Experiments and Analysis for Classroom Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1