Fully Automatic Analysis of Posterosuperior Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears from MRI

H. Hess, Philipp Gussarow, J. T. Rojas, Stefan Weber, Annabel Hayoz, M. Zumstein, Kate Gerber
{"title":"Fully Automatic Analysis of Posterosuperior Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears from MRI","authors":"H. Hess, Philipp Gussarow, J. T. Rojas, Stefan Weber, Annabel Hayoz, M. Zumstein, Kate Gerber","doi":"10.29007/fnjd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are one of the most common sources of shoulder pain. Many factors can be considered to choose the right surgical treatment procedure. Of the most important factors are the tear retraction and tear width, assessed manually on preoperative MRI.A novel approach to automatically quantify a rotator cuff tear, based on the segmentation of the tear from MRI images, was developed and validated. For segmentation, a neural network was trained and methods for the automatic calculation of the tear width and retraction from the segmented tear volume were developed.The accuracy of the automatic segmentation and the automated tear analysis were evaluated relative to manual consensus segmentations by two clinical experts. Variance in the manual segmentations was assessed in an interrater variability study of two clinical experts.The accuracy of the tear retraction calculation based on the developed automatic tear segmentation was 5.3 mm ± 5.0 mm in comparison to the interrater variability of tear retraction calculation based on manual segmentations of 3.6 mm ± 2.9 mm.These results show that an automatic quantification of a rotator cuff tear is possible. The large interrater variability of manual segmentation-based measurements highlights the difficulty of the tear segmentations task in general.","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/fnjd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are one of the most common sources of shoulder pain. Many factors can be considered to choose the right surgical treatment procedure. Of the most important factors are the tear retraction and tear width, assessed manually on preoperative MRI.A novel approach to automatically quantify a rotator cuff tear, based on the segmentation of the tear from MRI images, was developed and validated. For segmentation, a neural network was trained and methods for the automatic calculation of the tear width and retraction from the segmented tear volume were developed.The accuracy of the automatic segmentation and the automated tear analysis were evaluated relative to manual consensus segmentations by two clinical experts. Variance in the manual segmentations was assessed in an interrater variability study of two clinical experts.The accuracy of the tear retraction calculation based on the developed automatic tear segmentation was 5.3 mm ± 5.0 mm in comparison to the interrater variability of tear retraction calculation based on manual segmentations of 3.6 mm ± 2.9 mm.These results show that an automatic quantification of a rotator cuff tear is possible. The large interrater variability of manual segmentation-based measurements highlights the difficulty of the tear segmentations task in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MRI全自动分析后上全层肩袖撕裂
肩袖撕裂(RCT)是肩痛最常见的原因之一。选择正确的手术治疗方法需要考虑许多因素。最重要的因素是泪液收缩和泪液宽度,术前MRI人工评估。基于MRI图像撕裂的分割,开发并验证了一种自动量化肩袖撕裂的新方法。在分割方面,训练了神经网络,并开发了自动计算分割后泪液体积的泪液宽度和缩回的方法。两位临床专家对自动分割和自动撕裂分析的准确性进行了相对于人工共识分割的评估。在两个临床专家的变异研究中评估了人工分割的变异。基于自动撕裂分割的撕裂回缩计算精度为5.3 mm±5.0 mm,而基于人工撕裂回缩计算的撕裂回缩误差为3.6 mm±2.9 mm。这些结果表明,自动量化肩袖撕裂是可能的。基于人工分割的测量结果的大变异性突出了撕裂分割任务的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does your approach matter ? Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion Accuracy Evaluation of Image-Based Virtual Fixtures in Robotic Laminectomy Cloud-Based Three-Dimensional Pattern Analysis and Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures – A Feasibility Study Automated analysis of morpho-functional interbone parameters of the knee based on three dimensional (3D) surface data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1