Does augmented reality improve clinical outcome in TKA? A prospective observational report.

P. Van Overschelde, P. Vansintjan, P. Byn, Cynthia Lapierre, Wouter Van Lysebettens
{"title":"Does augmented reality improve clinical outcome in TKA? A prospective observational report.","authors":"P. Van Overschelde, P. Vansintjan, P. Byn, Cynthia Lapierre, Wouter Van Lysebettens","doi":"10.29007/wt68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS: The Pixee Knee+ system offers intraoperative assistance through augmented reality glasses. This allows the surgeon to see the tibial and femoral axis depicted on the surgical field, providing real-time information during surgery.METHODS: 122 patients received TKA surgery with the Pixee Knee+ system, and were matched based on gender and age to 122 patients who received conventional surgery. PROMs (Oxford knee Score, KOOS, and Forgotten Joint score) were collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 3 months. The difference between the scores at 6 weeks versus preoperative (Delta) was analyzed over time of surgery, in order to evaluate any possible surgeon learning curve.RESULTS: Pixee patients scored significantly lower on the symptoms sub-scale of the KOOS score at 6 weeks. Similarly, at 3 months, the Quality of life sub-score, Forgotten Joint score and Oxford Knee Score were all significantly worse for the Pixee group. When analyzing the Delta KOOS over time, a clear increase in the linear model could be established for the Pixee group, whereas the Delta KOOS outcomes in the conventional group remained at a plateau.CONCLUSION: The use of the Pixee Knee+ system results in an initial inferior clinical outcome when comparing the average of the two groups. This is likely explained by a learning curve, which shows an increase over time of the Delta KOOS at 6 weeks in the Pixee group. To what extent this increase over time will persist remains to be investigated","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/wt68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS: The Pixee Knee+ system offers intraoperative assistance through augmented reality glasses. This allows the surgeon to see the tibial and femoral axis depicted on the surgical field, providing real-time information during surgery.METHODS: 122 patients received TKA surgery with the Pixee Knee+ system, and were matched based on gender and age to 122 patients who received conventional surgery. PROMs (Oxford knee Score, KOOS, and Forgotten Joint score) were collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 3 months. The difference between the scores at 6 weeks versus preoperative (Delta) was analyzed over time of surgery, in order to evaluate any possible surgeon learning curve.RESULTS: Pixee patients scored significantly lower on the symptoms sub-scale of the KOOS score at 6 weeks. Similarly, at 3 months, the Quality of life sub-score, Forgotten Joint score and Oxford Knee Score were all significantly worse for the Pixee group. When analyzing the Delta KOOS over time, a clear increase in the linear model could be established for the Pixee group, whereas the Delta KOOS outcomes in the conventional group remained at a plateau.CONCLUSION: The use of the Pixee Knee+ system results in an initial inferior clinical outcome when comparing the average of the two groups. This is likely explained by a learning curve, which shows an increase over time of the Delta KOOS at 6 weeks in the Pixee group. To what extent this increase over time will persist remains to be investigated
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强现实能改善TKA的临床结果吗?前瞻性观察报告。
目的:Pixee Knee+系统通过增强现实眼镜提供术中辅助。这使得外科医生能够看到手术视野上描绘的胫骨和股轴,在手术过程中提供实时信息。方法:122例采用Pixee Knee+系统进行TKA手术的患者,与122例常规手术的患者按性别、年龄进行匹配。术前分别于6周和3个月采集PROMs(牛津膝关节评分、oos和遗忘关节评分)。随着手术时间的推移,分析6周时与术前(Delta)评分的差异,以评估任何可能的外科医生学习曲线。结果:Pixee患者在6周时kos评分的症状分量表得分显著降低。同样,在3个月时,Pixee组的生活质量评分、遗忘关节评分和牛津膝关节评分均明显较差。随着时间的推移分析Delta KOOS时,可以为Pixee组建立明显的线性模型,而传统组的Delta KOOS结果保持在平台状态。结论:当比较两组的平均值时,Pixee Knee+系统的使用导致最初的临床结果较差。这可能是由学习曲线来解释的,在Pixee组中,随着时间的推移,Delta KOOS在6周时增加。随着时间的推移,这种增长将持续到何种程度仍有待调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does your approach matter ? Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion Accuracy Evaluation of Image-Based Virtual Fixtures in Robotic Laminectomy Cloud-Based Three-Dimensional Pattern Analysis and Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures – A Feasibility Study Automated analysis of morpho-functional interbone parameters of the knee based on three dimensional (3D) surface data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1