Israel’s Deportation Policy of African Migrants: Internal and External Aspects

L. Khlebnikova
{"title":"Israel’s Deportation Policy of African Migrants: Internal and External Aspects","authors":"L. Khlebnikova","doi":"10.31132/2412-5717-2018-44-3-54-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016 Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu declared its comeback to Africa and Africa’s return to the Jewish state. The key reason for a new Israeli-African cooperation (especially between Israel and East African countries) seems to be an intent to regulate crisis with illegal immigrants from Africa in Israel. The author examines the drivers of the big inflow of African asylum seekers from Eritrea and Sudan trying to find ‘safe heaven’ in the Jewish State. Netanyahu prefers to treat these African asylum seekers as economic migrants. He often stresses that Israel is too small to accept everyone who is afflicted. In the Israeli society negative sentiments towards African asylum seekers are generally prevailing. However, there are some grassroots initiatives aimed at protecting Africans and their rights. Opposition parties, Zionist Union and Meretz, are not united and have not succeeded in challenging the government’s course. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the Israeli government’s approaches, including deportation of immigrants to ‘third countries’ like Rwanda and Uganda, aimed at resolving the crisis. The deportation of African asylum seekers provoked some new debates about rights of socially vulnerable groups in Israel and, moreover, its democratic character. The critique of the Netanyahu’s policies spread well beyond the borders of the State of Israel. The United Nations tried to resolve the crisis by offering a deal that would relocate Africans from Israel to different countries, but the head of the Jewish state, first agreed to sign it, but later changed his mind. Special attention is paid to the role of the American Jewish organizations in stopping the deportation of Africans from Israel. The American liberal progressive groups, for example J street, have been openly protesting against Netanyahu’s policies. The conclusion is drawn that the way out of the crisis lays in elaborating a long-term comprehensive migration strategy.","PeriodicalId":286957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2018-44-3-54-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016 Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu declared its comeback to Africa and Africa’s return to the Jewish state. The key reason for a new Israeli-African cooperation (especially between Israel and East African countries) seems to be an intent to regulate crisis with illegal immigrants from Africa in Israel. The author examines the drivers of the big inflow of African asylum seekers from Eritrea and Sudan trying to find ‘safe heaven’ in the Jewish State. Netanyahu prefers to treat these African asylum seekers as economic migrants. He often stresses that Israel is too small to accept everyone who is afflicted. In the Israeli society negative sentiments towards African asylum seekers are generally prevailing. However, there are some grassroots initiatives aimed at protecting Africans and their rights. Opposition parties, Zionist Union and Meretz, are not united and have not succeeded in challenging the government’s course. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the Israeli government’s approaches, including deportation of immigrants to ‘third countries’ like Rwanda and Uganda, aimed at resolving the crisis. The deportation of African asylum seekers provoked some new debates about rights of socially vulnerable groups in Israel and, moreover, its democratic character. The critique of the Netanyahu’s policies spread well beyond the borders of the State of Israel. The United Nations tried to resolve the crisis by offering a deal that would relocate Africans from Israel to different countries, but the head of the Jewish state, first agreed to sign it, but later changed his mind. Special attention is paid to the role of the American Jewish organizations in stopping the deportation of Africans from Israel. The American liberal progressive groups, for example J street, have been openly protesting against Netanyahu’s policies. The conclusion is drawn that the way out of the crisis lays in elaborating a long-term comprehensive migration strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以色列对非洲移民的驱逐政策:内部和外部方面
2016年,以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡宣布以色列回归非洲,非洲回归犹太国家。新的以色列-非洲合作(尤其是以色列和东非国家之间的合作)的关键原因似乎是为了管理来自非洲的非法移民在以色列的危机。作者研究了来自厄立特里亚和苏丹的大量非洲寻求庇护者试图在犹太国家找到“安全天堂”的驱动因素。内塔尼亚胡倾向于将这些非洲寻求庇护者视为经济移民。他经常强调,以色列太小,无法接纳所有受苦的人。在以色列社会中,对非洲寻求庇护者的负面情绪普遍存在。然而,也有一些旨在保护非洲人及其权利的基层倡议。反对党犹太复国主义联盟(Zionist Union)和梅雷兹党(Meretz)没有团结起来,也没有成功地挑战政府的路线。这项研究的主要目标是评估以色列政府的方法,包括将移民驱逐到卢旺达和乌干达等“第三国”,旨在解决危机。非洲寻求庇护者被驱逐出境引发了关于以色列社会弱势群体权利的一些新的辩论,而且还引起了关于以色列民主性质的辩论。对内塔尼亚胡政策的批评远远超出了以色列的国界。联合国试图通过提出一项协议来解决这场危机,该协议将把非洲人从以色列重新安置到不同的国家,但这个犹太国家的领导人最初同意签署该协议,但后来改变了主意。特别注意到美国犹太组织在制止将非洲人驱逐出以色列方面所起的作用。美国自由进步团体,如J街,一直公开抗议内塔尼亚胡的政策。得出的结论是,摆脱危机的途径在于制定一项长期全面的移民战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living Standards in Sub–Saharan Africa: Current Situation and Stimulation of Growth Expounding the Diversity of African Construction of Fertility: the Yorùbá Example Prospects for the Development of Russian-African Cooperation in the Cultural and Humanitarian Sphere Sudan and South Sudan: Through the Deconstruction and Transformation of Power to its Evolution Keeping Financial System Clean: Suppressing Terrorist Infiltration of Money or Value Transfer Services in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1