Wellbeing fostered by design: a framework for evaluating indoor environment performance

Juliana Croffi, D. Kroll, V. Soebarto, H. Barrie, Kelly McDougall
{"title":"Wellbeing fostered by design: a framework for evaluating indoor environment performance","authors":"Juliana Croffi, D. Kroll, V. Soebarto, H. Barrie, Kelly McDougall","doi":"10.5334/bc.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-rise urban development has been controversial for its inability to foster cohesive and flourishing neighbourhoods. A social value perspective can help to better understand and evaluate how new developments in dense urban settings affect places and communities. While the link between wellbeing and social value is well-established in the literature, the question of how design can affect wellbeing and thus contribute to the social value of a development still requires further research and clarification. A better understanding of this relationship can assist architects, developers or consultants during the design process. A review is presented of relevant quantifiable aspects of building design that affect wellbeing in relation to the indoor environment and to social value specifically. A framework for fostering wellbeing is developed to test these aspects and evaluate the indoor environment performance. A case study building is used to analyse the relationship between building design and wellbeing. These lessons can be used to inform and evaluate building design during the design phases to complement the assessment of qualitative factors within a social value framework.\nPractice relevance\nThis study identifies quantifiable aspects of the indoor environment affecting wellbeing in a high-rise development that can form part of a social value framework. This list of identified aspects provides a useful starting point for architects or consultants to assess designs. The indicators relate to quantifiable indoor environment aspects that can be directly controlled by building design and complement the broader concepts of wellbeing within a social value framework. The paper demonstrates how these aspects can be quantified in a case study mixed-use urban development as part of a post-occupancy evaluation. These quantifiable aspects could be integrated within digital tools to evaluate the building at the design stage to ensure that wellbeing is at the forefront of the project considerations.","PeriodicalId":363849,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Cities","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

High-rise urban development has been controversial for its inability to foster cohesive and flourishing neighbourhoods. A social value perspective can help to better understand and evaluate how new developments in dense urban settings affect places and communities. While the link between wellbeing and social value is well-established in the literature, the question of how design can affect wellbeing and thus contribute to the social value of a development still requires further research and clarification. A better understanding of this relationship can assist architects, developers or consultants during the design process. A review is presented of relevant quantifiable aspects of building design that affect wellbeing in relation to the indoor environment and to social value specifically. A framework for fostering wellbeing is developed to test these aspects and evaluate the indoor environment performance. A case study building is used to analyse the relationship between building design and wellbeing. These lessons can be used to inform and evaluate building design during the design phases to complement the assessment of qualitative factors within a social value framework. Practice relevance This study identifies quantifiable aspects of the indoor environment affecting wellbeing in a high-rise development that can form part of a social value framework. This list of identified aspects provides a useful starting point for architects or consultants to assess designs. The indicators relate to quantifiable indoor environment aspects that can be directly controlled by building design and complement the broader concepts of wellbeing within a social value framework. The paper demonstrates how these aspects can be quantified in a case study mixed-use urban development as part of a post-occupancy evaluation. These quantifiable aspects could be integrated within digital tools to evaluate the building at the design stage to ensure that wellbeing is at the forefront of the project considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计促进健康:评估室内环境性能的框架
高层城市发展一直饱受争议,因为它无法形成有凝聚力和繁荣的社区。社会价值视角有助于更好地理解和评估密集城市环境中的新发展如何影响地方和社区。虽然幸福感和社会价值之间的联系在文献中得到了证实,但设计如何影响幸福感,从而促进发展的社会价值,这一问题仍需要进一步研究和澄清。更好地理解这种关系可以在设计过程中为建筑师、开发商或顾问提供帮助。回顾了影响室内环境和社会价值的建筑设计的相关可量化方面。开发了一个促进健康的框架来测试这些方面并评估室内环境性能。一个案例研究建筑被用来分析建筑设计和健康之间的关系。这些经验教训可用于在设计阶段通知和评估建筑设计,以补充社会价值框架内定性因素的评估。实践相关性本研究确定了影响高层开发中幸福感的室内环境的可量化方面,这些方面可以构成社会价值框架的一部分。这个已确定的方面列表为建筑师或顾问评估设计提供了一个有用的起点。这些指标涉及可量化的室内环境方面,可以通过建筑设计直接控制,并在社会价值框架内补充更广泛的健康概念。本文展示了如何在一个案例研究中量化这些方面,作为使用后评估的一部分,混合用途城市发展。这些可量化的方面可以整合到数字工具中,在设计阶段评估建筑,以确保健康是项目考虑的首要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1