Reduction of Income Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Which Fiscal Instrument Matters?

A.M. Martin
{"title":"Reduction of Income Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Which Fiscal Instrument Matters?","authors":"A.M. Martin","doi":"10.31014/AIOR.1992.03.03.270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing literature is inconclusive on the relationship between fiscal instruments and income inequality. Many governments concerned with issues of income redistribution have paid attention to the way in which tax revenues are collected. In this study we shed new light on this issue by empirically investigating which between weight of tax revenues and tax structure used to collect revenues is more important in reducing income inequality in SSA. We use panel data on 34 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries over the period of 1992- 2014. Our model was inspired by the model developed by Martinez-Vazquez and al. (2012) and modified by Dao and Godbout (2014). We present both conventional fixed effect regressions and instrumental variable analyses, where fiscal instruments using the employment rate and the proportion of the working-age population as an instrument. The results reveal that the fiscal instrument tax revenues are count much more in reducing inequalities than the fiscal instrument used to collect revenues. The results are robust to different econometric specifications.","PeriodicalId":105668,"journal":{"name":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31014/AIOR.1992.03.03.270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature is inconclusive on the relationship between fiscal instruments and income inequality. Many governments concerned with issues of income redistribution have paid attention to the way in which tax revenues are collected. In this study we shed new light on this issue by empirically investigating which between weight of tax revenues and tax structure used to collect revenues is more important in reducing income inequality in SSA. We use panel data on 34 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries over the period of 1992- 2014. Our model was inspired by the model developed by Martinez-Vazquez and al. (2012) and modified by Dao and Godbout (2014). We present both conventional fixed effect regressions and instrumental variable analyses, where fiscal instruments using the employment rate and the proportion of the working-age population as an instrument. The results reveal that the fiscal instrument tax revenues are count much more in reducing inequalities than the fiscal instrument used to collect revenues. The results are robust to different econometric specifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少撒哈拉以南非洲的收入不平等:哪个财政工具重要?
现有文献对财政工具与收入不平等之间的关系尚无定论。许多关心收入再分配问题的政府都注意到税收的征收方式。在本研究中,我们通过实证调查税收收入的权重和用于征收收入的税收结构之间哪一个在减少社会保障体系的收入不平等方面更重要,从而对这一问题有了新的认识。我们使用了1992年至2014年期间34个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的面板数据。我们的模型受到Martinez-Vazquez等人(2012)开发的模型的启发,并由Dao和Godbout(2014)修改。我们提出了传统的固定效应回归和工具变量分析,其中财政工具使用就业率和工作年龄人口的比例作为工具。结果表明,财政工具税收收入在减少不平等方面比用于征收收入的财政工具更重要。结果对不同的计量指标具有稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Process of Economic Development in West Sichuan: The Case of Daocheng County Impact of Global Value Chain on the Performance of SMEs Village Action Plans Through Local Participation Pakistan and Bangladesh: Comparative Economic Analysis (1971-2020) Sri Lankan Economy in Conflict with COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1