Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Jianjun Li, B. Huang, Qian Cen, Guanglei Zhao
{"title":"Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions","authors":"Jianjun Li, B. Huang, Qian Cen, Guanglei Zhao","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.992165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To discuss the problems in coding of percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods. Collecting 216 medical records of percutaneous coronary intervention, analyzing the mistakes of major surgery completed, and coding by ICD-9-CM-3 coding principles. Results. Of the records analyzed, 69 records had errors, the total error rate was found to be 31.9%. The main mistake committed by the coders was the omission of the code for the coronary artery, accounting for 53.2%. Conclusion. We should strengthen special training on knowledge of the ICD-9-CM3 principles of coding for coronary artery stenting surgery for cardiologists, and improve the level of business and coding ability of coders. The joint efforts of both parties will reduce the error rate in the coding of percutaneous coronary intervention.","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.992165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractObjective. To discuss the problems in coding of percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods. Collecting 216 medical records of percutaneous coronary intervention, analyzing the mistakes of major surgery completed, and coding by ICD-9-CM-3 coding principles. Results. Of the records analyzed, 69 records had errors, the total error rate was found to be 31.9%. The main mistake committed by the coders was the omission of the code for the coronary artery, accounting for 53.2%. Conclusion. We should strengthen special training on knowledge of the ICD-9-CM3 principles of coding for coronary artery stenting surgery for cardiologists, and improve the level of business and coding ability of coders. The joint efforts of both parties will reduce the error rate in the coding of percutaneous coronary intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
216例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ICD-9-CM-3编码误差分析与探讨
AbstractObjective。探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的编码问题。方法。收集216例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗病历,分析已完成大手术的错误,按ICD-9-CM-3编码原则进行编码。结果。在分析的记录中,有69条记录存在错误,总错误率为31.9%。编码人员犯的主要错误是冠状动脉编码的遗漏,占53.2%。结论。加强对心内科医生ICD-9-CM3冠状动脉支架手术编码原理知识的专项培训,提高编码人员的业务水平和编码能力。双方的共同努力将降低经皮冠状动脉介入治疗编码的错误率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discussion on the Method of Classifi cation of Medical Syndromes in the ICD-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions A Discussion on ICD-10 Coding of Infantile Diarrheal Disease Predictive Analysis of Outpatient Volumes of a First-class Grade A General Hospital through ARIMA Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1