Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the Us Ethanol Mandate

M. Roberts, W. Schlenker
{"title":"Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the Us Ethanol Mandate","authors":"M. Roberts, W. Schlenker","doi":"10.1257/AER.103.6.2265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a new framework to identify demand and supply elasticities of agricultural commodities using yield shocks - deviations from a time trend of output per area, which are predominantly caused by weather fluctuations. Demand is identified using current-period shocks that give rise to exogenous shifts in supply. Supply is identified using past shocks, which affect expected future prices through inventory accretion or depletion. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of ethanol subsidies and mandates on world food commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus. The current US ethanol mandate requires that about 5 percent of world caloric production from corn, wheat, rice, and soybeans be used for ethanol generation. As a result, world food prices are predicted to increase by about 30 percent and global consumer surplus from food consumption is predicted to decrease by 155 billion dollars annually. If a third of the biofuel calories are recycled as feed stock for livestock, the predicted price increase scales back to 20 percent. While commodity demand is extremely inelastic, price response is muted by a significant supply response that is obscured if futures prices are not instrumented. The resulting expansion of agricultural growing area potentially offsets the CO2 emission benefits from biofuels.","PeriodicalId":320530,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Biofuels (Topic)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"427","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Biofuels (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.103.6.2265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 427

Abstract

We present a new framework to identify demand and supply elasticities of agricultural commodities using yield shocks - deviations from a time trend of output per area, which are predominantly caused by weather fluctuations. Demand is identified using current-period shocks that give rise to exogenous shifts in supply. Supply is identified using past shocks, which affect expected future prices through inventory accretion or depletion. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of ethanol subsidies and mandates on world food commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus. The current US ethanol mandate requires that about 5 percent of world caloric production from corn, wheat, rice, and soybeans be used for ethanol generation. As a result, world food prices are predicted to increase by about 30 percent and global consumer surplus from food consumption is predicted to decrease by 155 billion dollars annually. If a third of the biofuel calories are recycled as feed stock for livestock, the predicted price increase scales back to 20 percent. While commodity demand is extremely inelastic, price response is muted by a significant supply response that is obscured if futures prices are not instrumented. The resulting expansion of agricultural growing area potentially offsets the CO2 emission benefits from biofuels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定农产品的供需弹性:对美国乙醇授权的影响
我们提出了一个新的框架,利用产量冲击来确定农产品的需求和供应弹性,产量冲击是指与单位面积产量的时间趋势的偏差,主要由天气波动引起。需求是通过引起供给外生变化的当期冲击来确定的。供应是通过过去的冲击来确定的,这些冲击通过库存的增加或消耗来影响预期的未来价格。我们使用我们估计的弹性来评估乙醇补贴和规定对世界粮食商品价格、数量和粮食消费者剩余的影响。目前,美国的乙醇法规要求将全球玉米、小麦、大米和大豆产生的热量的5%用于乙醇生产。因此,世界粮食价格预计将上涨30%左右,全球粮食消费的消费者剩余预计每年将减少1550亿美元。如果三分之一的生物燃料热量被回收利用作为牲畜饲料,预计价格上涨幅度将回落至20%。尽管大宗商品需求极度缺乏弹性,但如果不考虑期货价格,价格反应就会被显著的供应反应所掩盖。由此导致的农业种植面积的扩大可能抵消生物燃料带来的二氧化碳排放效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioelectricity in Malaysia: Economic Feasibility, Environmental and Deforestation Implications Subsidize Farmers or the Bioenergy Producer? The Design of a Government Subsidy Program for a Bioenergy Supply Chain Technical Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potentials of Biochar Soil Incorporation in Germany The Power of Biomass: Experts Disclose the Potential for Success of Bioenergy Technologies Biofuels Policy in Europe Under the Directive 2003/30: An Analysis of Goals, Hindrances, Instruments and Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1