Orientation in Onto-Epistemology

I. Tuin
{"title":"Orientation in Onto-Epistemology","authors":"I. Tuin","doi":"10.14361/9783839450666-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conference asks: what is the potential of new materialism for historical research, on the one hand, and, on the other, for teaching and learning history? What are the opportunities and limitations of taking material sources (objects) not as passive remains but as actors of the past, in the present and for the future? How do objects participate in reflection on history as constructed? I want to answer these and slightly other questions by focusing on methodology, because not only do objects participate in reflection on history as constructed, but also are objects themselves historical, contemporary and speculative material. Objects participate in constructing history. Given that this hinders any form of direct engagement, naturally, the scholar is urged situate her knowledges. Objects exist in duration (ontology, aesthetics) and they are sensitive to the temporalities imposed on them (epistemology, ethics). Aesthetic and academic measurement is necessarily involved in our, and others‹, spatiotemporal and (inter)disciplinary engagement with objects. Hence, neither objects‹ descriptive, prescriptive or visionary labeling, nor their durational dimensions, shared with other matter, and with humans, animals, plants, genes, atoms, quanta, code, in multi-leveled interand intra-acting networks, are objective in the sense of neutral, disinterested. Choosing an approach, then, is unavoidable. Here, I choose to approach objects as embedded in, and embodied by, a specific historical, present and future time, and a specific temporality of theory, and I choose a location. Quite obviously, as I do my research in an entangled web of connections, the decisions I take for this talk do not exhaust the performativity (the doings) of objects, concepts or my measurement apparatus more widely conceived. They may travel to any discipline or discussion whatever. I would suggest that each of you here present and presenting reveals and releases her orientation in onto-epistemology (meaning quite simply: knowing in being).","PeriodicalId":340392,"journal":{"name":"Historisches Lernen und Materielle Kultur","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historisches Lernen und Materielle Kultur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839450666-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This conference asks: what is the potential of new materialism for historical research, on the one hand, and, on the other, for teaching and learning history? What are the opportunities and limitations of taking material sources (objects) not as passive remains but as actors of the past, in the present and for the future? How do objects participate in reflection on history as constructed? I want to answer these and slightly other questions by focusing on methodology, because not only do objects participate in reflection on history as constructed, but also are objects themselves historical, contemporary and speculative material. Objects participate in constructing history. Given that this hinders any form of direct engagement, naturally, the scholar is urged situate her knowledges. Objects exist in duration (ontology, aesthetics) and they are sensitive to the temporalities imposed on them (epistemology, ethics). Aesthetic and academic measurement is necessarily involved in our, and others‹, spatiotemporal and (inter)disciplinary engagement with objects. Hence, neither objects‹ descriptive, prescriptive or visionary labeling, nor their durational dimensions, shared with other matter, and with humans, animals, plants, genes, atoms, quanta, code, in multi-leveled interand intra-acting networks, are objective in the sense of neutral, disinterested. Choosing an approach, then, is unavoidable. Here, I choose to approach objects as embedded in, and embodied by, a specific historical, present and future time, and a specific temporality of theory, and I choose a location. Quite obviously, as I do my research in an entangled web of connections, the decisions I take for this talk do not exhaust the performativity (the doings) of objects, concepts or my measurement apparatus more widely conceived. They may travel to any discipline or discussion whatever. I would suggest that each of you here present and presenting reveals and releases her orientation in onto-epistemology (meaning quite simply: knowing in being).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体认识论的取向
本次会议提出的问题是:新唯物主义在历史研究和历史教学方面的潜力是什么?将物质来源(物体)不作为被动的遗留物,而是作为过去、现在和未来的行动者,有什么机会和限制?作为建构的历史,对象是如何参与反思的?我想通过关注方法论来回答这些问题和其他一些问题,因为对象不仅参与了对历史的反思,而且对象本身也是历史的、当代的和思辨的材料。对象参与历史的建构。考虑到这阻碍了任何形式的直接参与,自然地,学者被敦促对她的知识进行定位。对象是持续存在的(本体论、美学),它们对强加给它们的时间性是敏感的(认识论、伦理学)。美学和学术测量必然涉及我们和他人与物体的时空和(跨)学科接触。因此,在多层次的相互作用和相互作用的网络中,无论是与其他物质、人类、动物、植物、基因、原子、量子、代码共享的物体(描述性的、规定性的或想象性的标签),还是它们的持续维度,都不是中立、无私意义上的客观。因此,选择一种方法是不可避免的。在这里,我选择将对象嵌入并体现在特定的历史、现在和未来时间,以及理论的特定时间性中,并选择一个位置。很明显,当我在一个错综复杂的关系网中做我的研究时,我为这次演讲所做的决定并没有穷尽物体、概念或我的测量仪器的性能(行为)。他们可以去参加任何学科或讨论。我建议你们在座的每一个人展示并释放她在本体认识论中的定位(意思很简单:在存在中认识)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Von der Immanenz zur Transzendenz der Dinge Inhalt Aus den Quellen quillt nichts Haptische Irritationen Orientation in Onto-Epistemology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1