{"title":"The Legal Combatting of B-BBEE Fronting Practices in South Africa – Past and Present","authors":"Adri Du Plessis","doi":"10.47348/slr/2022/i3a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment is critical in establishing an inclusive South African economy based on social and economic justice. However, since its inception in 2003 with the promulgation of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, misrepresentations intended to improve an enterprise’s compliance status – fronting – have been ever-present. From 2003 to 2013, there was no clear approach to dealing with fronting, which, at least in part, led to increases in the incidence and complexity of this practice. In an attempt to deal more decisively with the issue, the 2013 amendment to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act introduced two specific measures to combat this problem. The first was criminalising fronting practices, and the second was establishing a monitoring body, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission. This article briefly sketches the policy and legislative framework for implementing the Broad-Based Black Economic initiative and past practices of combatting fronting practices. This is followed by a discussion of the two measures introduced by the amendment to the Act, with a specific focus on the Commission’s role since its inception to monitor and combat fronting practices. There will also be a discussion of the various activities that the Commission reports on concerning its dealing with fronting. The article concludes with suggestions for changes to the regulatory environment that could improve the efficacy of the fight against fronting.","PeriodicalId":325707,"journal":{"name":"Stellenbosch Law Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stellenbosch Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/slr/2022/i3a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment is critical in establishing an inclusive South African economy based on social and economic justice. However, since its inception in 2003 with the promulgation of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, misrepresentations intended to improve an enterprise’s compliance status – fronting – have been ever-present. From 2003 to 2013, there was no clear approach to dealing with fronting, which, at least in part, led to increases in the incidence and complexity of this practice. In an attempt to deal more decisively with the issue, the 2013 amendment to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act introduced two specific measures to combat this problem. The first was criminalising fronting practices, and the second was establishing a monitoring body, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission. This article briefly sketches the policy and legislative framework for implementing the Broad-Based Black Economic initiative and past practices of combatting fronting practices. This is followed by a discussion of the two measures introduced by the amendment to the Act, with a specific focus on the Commission’s role since its inception to monitor and combat fronting practices. There will also be a discussion of the various activities that the Commission reports on concerning its dealing with fronting. The article concludes with suggestions for changes to the regulatory environment that could improve the efficacy of the fight against fronting.
基础广泛的黑人经济赋权对于建立一个以社会和经济正义为基础的包容性南非经济至关重要。然而,自2003年《广泛的黑人经济赋权法案》颁布以来,旨在改善企业合规状况的虚假陈述(即“正面”)一直存在。从2003年到2013年,没有明确的方法来处理这种做法,这至少在一定程度上导致了这种做法的发生率和复杂性的增加。为了更果断地解决这一问题,2013年《基础广泛的黑人经济赋权法案》(Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act)的修正案引入了两项具体措施来解决这一问题。第一个是将幌子行为定为犯罪,第二个是建立一个监测机构,即基础广泛的黑人经济赋权委员会。本文简要概述了实施“基础广泛的黑人经济倡议”的政策和立法框架以及过去打击对抗做法的做法。随后讨论了该法案修正案所提出的两项措施,特别侧重于委员会自成立以来在监测和打击对抗做法方面的作用。会议还将讨论委员会所报告的与应付前线问题有关的各种活动。文章最后提出了改变监管环境的建议,以提高打击假冒伪劣产品的效率。