The Legal Combatting of B-BBEE Fronting Practices in South Africa – Past and Present

Adri Du Plessis
{"title":"The Legal Combatting of B-BBEE Fronting Practices in South Africa – Past and Present","authors":"Adri Du Plessis","doi":"10.47348/slr/2022/i3a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment is critical in establishing an inclusive South African economy based on social and economic justice. However, since its inception in 2003 with the promulgation of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, misrepresentations intended to improve an enterprise’s compliance status – fronting – have been ever-present. From 2003 to 2013, there was no clear approach to dealing with fronting, which, at least in part, led to increases in the incidence and complexity of this practice. In an attempt to deal more decisively with the issue, the 2013 amendment to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act introduced two specific measures to combat this problem. The first was criminalising fronting practices, and the second was establishing a monitoring body, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission. This article briefly sketches the policy and legislative framework for implementing the Broad-Based Black Economic initiative and past practices of combatting fronting practices. This is followed by a discussion of the two measures introduced by the amendment to the Act, with a specific focus on the Commission’s role since its inception to monitor and combat fronting practices. There will also be a discussion of the various activities that the Commission reports on concerning its dealing with fronting. The article concludes with suggestions for changes to the regulatory environment that could improve the efficacy of the fight against fronting.","PeriodicalId":325707,"journal":{"name":"Stellenbosch Law Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stellenbosch Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/slr/2022/i3a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment is critical in establishing an inclusive South African economy based on social and economic justice. However, since its inception in 2003 with the promulgation of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, misrepresentations intended to improve an enterprise’s compliance status – fronting – have been ever-present. From 2003 to 2013, there was no clear approach to dealing with fronting, which, at least in part, led to increases in the incidence and complexity of this practice. In an attempt to deal more decisively with the issue, the 2013 amendment to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act introduced two specific measures to combat this problem. The first was criminalising fronting practices, and the second was establishing a monitoring body, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission. This article briefly sketches the policy and legislative framework for implementing the Broad-Based Black Economic initiative and past practices of combatting fronting practices. This is followed by a discussion of the two measures introduced by the amendment to the Act, with a specific focus on the Commission’s role since its inception to monitor and combat fronting practices. There will also be a discussion of the various activities that the Commission reports on concerning its dealing with fronting. The article concludes with suggestions for changes to the regulatory environment that could improve the efficacy of the fight against fronting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非对B-BBEE对抗行为的法律斗争——过去与现在
基础广泛的黑人经济赋权对于建立一个以社会和经济正义为基础的包容性南非经济至关重要。然而,自2003年《广泛的黑人经济赋权法案》颁布以来,旨在改善企业合规状况的虚假陈述(即“正面”)一直存在。从2003年到2013年,没有明确的方法来处理这种做法,这至少在一定程度上导致了这种做法的发生率和复杂性的增加。为了更果断地解决这一问题,2013年《基础广泛的黑人经济赋权法案》(Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act)的修正案引入了两项具体措施来解决这一问题。第一个是将幌子行为定为犯罪,第二个是建立一个监测机构,即基础广泛的黑人经济赋权委员会。本文简要概述了实施“基础广泛的黑人经济倡议”的政策和立法框架以及过去打击对抗做法的做法。随后讨论了该法案修正案所提出的两项措施,特别侧重于委员会自成立以来在监测和打击对抗做法方面的作用。会议还将讨论委员会所报告的与应付前线问题有关的各种活动。文章最后提出了改变监管环境的建议,以提高打击假冒伪劣产品的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Providing Greater Clarity on the Meaning of Basic Education [Discussion of Moko V Acting Principal, Malusi Secondary School 2021 3 SA 323 (CC)] The best interests of the child in the face of COVID-19 travel restrictions: Analysing the rights of children and parents [Discussion of CD v Department of Social Development (5570/2020) [2020] ZAWCHC 25 (14 April 2020)] The Protection of the Environmental Rights and Interests of Children: A South African Perspective The Legal Combatting of B-BBEE Fronting Practices in South Africa – Past and Present King NNO V De Jager 2021 4 SA 1 (CC): Three Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1