The spectral similarity scale and its application to the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data

James Norman Sweet
{"title":"The spectral similarity scale and its application to the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data","authors":"James Norman Sweet","doi":"10.1109/WARSD.2003.1295179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hyperspectral images have considerable information content and are becoming common. Analysis tools must keep up with the changing demands and opportunities posed by the new datasets. Many spectral image analysis algorithms depend on a scalar measure of spectral similarity or 'spectral distance' to provide an estimate of how closely two spectra resemble each other. Unfortunately, traditional spectral similarity measures are ambiguous in their distinction of similarity. Traditional metrics can define a pair of spectra to be nearly identical mathematically yet visual inspection shows them to be spectroscopically dissimilar. These algorithms do not separately quantify both magnitude and direction differences. Three common algorithms used to measure the distance between remotely sensed reflectance spectra are Euclidean distance, correlation coefficient, and spectral angle. Euclidean distance primarily measures overall brightness differences but does not respond to the correlation (or lack thereof) between two spectra. The correlation coefficient is very responsive to differences in direction (i.e. spectral shape) but does not respond to brightness differences due to band-independent gain or offset factors. Spectral angle is closely related mathematically to the correlation coefficient and is primarily responsive to differences in spectral shape. However, spectral angle does respond to brightness differences due to a uniform offset, which confounds the interpretation of the spectral angle value. This paper proposes the spectral similarity scale (SSS) as an algorithm that objectively quantifies differences between reflectance spectra in both magnitude and direction dimensions (i.e. brightness and spectral shape). Therefore, the SSS is a fundamental improvement in the description of distance or similarity between two reflectance spectra. In addition, it demonstrates the use of the SSS by discussing an unsupervised classification algorithm based on the SSS named ClaSSS.","PeriodicalId":395735,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WARSD.2003.1295179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

Hyperspectral images have considerable information content and are becoming common. Analysis tools must keep up with the changing demands and opportunities posed by the new datasets. Many spectral image analysis algorithms depend on a scalar measure of spectral similarity or 'spectral distance' to provide an estimate of how closely two spectra resemble each other. Unfortunately, traditional spectral similarity measures are ambiguous in their distinction of similarity. Traditional metrics can define a pair of spectra to be nearly identical mathematically yet visual inspection shows them to be spectroscopically dissimilar. These algorithms do not separately quantify both magnitude and direction differences. Three common algorithms used to measure the distance between remotely sensed reflectance spectra are Euclidean distance, correlation coefficient, and spectral angle. Euclidean distance primarily measures overall brightness differences but does not respond to the correlation (or lack thereof) between two spectra. The correlation coefficient is very responsive to differences in direction (i.e. spectral shape) but does not respond to brightness differences due to band-independent gain or offset factors. Spectral angle is closely related mathematically to the correlation coefficient and is primarily responsive to differences in spectral shape. However, spectral angle does respond to brightness differences due to a uniform offset, which confounds the interpretation of the spectral angle value. This paper proposes the spectral similarity scale (SSS) as an algorithm that objectively quantifies differences between reflectance spectra in both magnitude and direction dimensions (i.e. brightness and spectral shape). Therefore, the SSS is a fundamental improvement in the description of distance or similarity between two reflectance spectra. In addition, it demonstrates the use of the SSS by discussing an unsupervised classification algorithm based on the SSS named ClaSSS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光谱相似度尺度及其在高光谱遥感数据分类中的应用
高光谱图像具有相当大的信息量,正变得越来越普遍。分析工具必须跟上新数据集带来的不断变化的需求和机会。许多光谱图像分析算法依赖于光谱相似度或“光谱距离”的标量度量来提供两个光谱彼此相似程度的估计。不幸的是,传统的光谱相似性度量在相似性的区分上是模糊的。传统的度量可以定义一对光谱在数学上几乎相同,但目视检查显示它们在光谱上是不同的。这些算法不能分别量化幅度和方向差异。测量遥感反射率光谱间距离的常用算法有欧几里得距离、相关系数和光谱角。欧几里得距离主要测量整体亮度差异,但不响应两个光谱之间的相关性(或缺乏相关性)。相关系数对方向(即光谱形状)的差异非常敏感,但对波段无关增益或偏移因素引起的亮度差异没有反应。光谱角在数学上与相关系数密切相关,主要对光谱形状的差异作出反应。然而,由于均匀偏移,光谱角确实响应亮度差异,这混淆了光谱角值的解释。本文提出光谱相似尺度(SSS)作为一种客观量化反射光谱在星等和方向两个维度(即亮度和光谱形状)差异的算法。因此,在描述两个反射光谱之间的距离或相似性方面,SSS是一个根本性的改进。此外,通过讨论基于SSS的无监督分类算法ClaSSS,演示了SSS的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A residual-based approach to classification of remote sensing images Operational segmentation and classification of SAR sea ice imagery The spectral similarity scale and its application to the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data Further results on AMM for endmember induction Spatial/Spectral analysis of hyperspectral image data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1