Reuse of verification efforts and incomplete specifications in a formalized, iterative and incremental software process

R. Redondo, J. Pazos-Arias
{"title":"Reuse of verification efforts and incomplete specifications in a formalized, iterative and incremental software process","authors":"R. Redondo, J. Pazos-Arias","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2001.919185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility of verifying systems during any phase of the software development process is one of the most significant advantages of using formal methods. Model checking is considered to be the broadest-used formal verification technique, even though a great quantity of computing resources are needed to verify medium-large and large systems. As verification is present over the whole software process, this amount of resources is more critical in incremental and iterative life-cycles. Our proposal focuses on reusing incomplete models and their verification results - which are obtained from a model-checking algorithm - in order to improve this kind of life-cycle. Making good use of these previous verification results can reduce the formal verification costs by minimizing the set of requirements and the set of system states where the properties must be verified. The unspecification that is inherent to incomplete systems is used to provide an approximate and content-oriented retrieval which is supplemented by suggestions to match the desired specifications.","PeriodicalId":374824,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2001.919185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The possibility of verifying systems during any phase of the software development process is one of the most significant advantages of using formal methods. Model checking is considered to be the broadest-used formal verification technique, even though a great quantity of computing resources are needed to verify medium-large and large systems. As verification is present over the whole software process, this amount of resources is more critical in incremental and iterative life-cycles. Our proposal focuses on reusing incomplete models and their verification results - which are obtained from a model-checking algorithm - in order to improve this kind of life-cycle. Making good use of these previous verification results can reduce the formal verification costs by minimizing the set of requirements and the set of system states where the properties must be verified. The unspecification that is inherent to incomplete systems is used to provide an approximate and content-oriented retrieval which is supplemented by suggestions to match the desired specifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在形式化的、迭代的和增量的软件过程中重用验证工作和不完整的规范
在软件开发过程的任何阶段验证系统的可能性是使用形式化方法的最重要的优点之一。模型检查被认为是使用最广泛的形式验证技术,尽管验证中大型和大型系统需要大量的计算资源。由于验证存在于整个软件过程中,这部分资源在增量和迭代生命周期中更为关键。我们的建议侧重于重用不完整的模型及其验证结果(由模型检查算法获得),以改善这种生命周期。充分利用这些先前的验证结果,可以通过最小化必须验证属性的需求集和系统状态集来减少正式验证的成本。不完整系统固有的不规范被用来提供近似的和面向内容的检索,并辅以匹配所需规范的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maintenance support tools for Java programs: CCFinder and JAAT (W18) 1st workshop on open source software engineering Consistent group membership in ad hoc networks A scalable formal method for design and automatic checking of user interfaces An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1