Brief report of the effects of seven human drugs studied on ants as models

Marie Claire Cammaerts
{"title":"Brief report of the effects of seven human drugs studied on ants as models","authors":"Marie Claire Cammaerts","doi":"10.15406/mojbm.2019.04.00112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2012, we used ants as models for examining the effects of products used by humans. Here, we summarize our seven last studies which concerned green clay, glucosamine, sildenafil, a homeopathic drug, as well as diclofenac, meloxicam and etoricoxib, three anti–inflammatory drugs. Green clay appeared to be an excellent product without adverse effects. In humans, it allows reducing gastric hyperacidity and should thus be used instead of aluminum hydroxide or calcium + magnesium carbonates which present adverse effects. Glucosamine was also safe. It only increased the ants’ locomotion and this effect might explain, at least partly, its efficiency. Sildenafil has many adverse effects, the cause of which being probably a decrease of sensitive perception. Such an impact may result from the activity of sildenafil: it inhibits phosphodiesterases and increases amounts of cGMP and cAMP. The homeopathic drug Ignatia amara, used for decreasing stress symptoms, had no adverse effects and unexpectedly reduced the ants’ state of stress. Even if its functioning stays unknown, this drug could help stressed persons. Diclofenac had several adverse effects and may lead to dependence; meloxicam had far less adverse effects and did not lead to dependence; etoricoxib had some adverse effects and did not lead to dependence. Obviously, meloxicam was the safest of the three anti–inflammatory drugs. Experimentation on ants can thus inform practitioners and pharmacists on potential harmful effects of products before providing them to humans.","PeriodicalId":127077,"journal":{"name":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2019.04.00112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Since 2012, we used ants as models for examining the effects of products used by humans. Here, we summarize our seven last studies which concerned green clay, glucosamine, sildenafil, a homeopathic drug, as well as diclofenac, meloxicam and etoricoxib, three anti–inflammatory drugs. Green clay appeared to be an excellent product without adverse effects. In humans, it allows reducing gastric hyperacidity and should thus be used instead of aluminum hydroxide or calcium + magnesium carbonates which present adverse effects. Glucosamine was also safe. It only increased the ants’ locomotion and this effect might explain, at least partly, its efficiency. Sildenafil has many adverse effects, the cause of which being probably a decrease of sensitive perception. Such an impact may result from the activity of sildenafil: it inhibits phosphodiesterases and increases amounts of cGMP and cAMP. The homeopathic drug Ignatia amara, used for decreasing stress symptoms, had no adverse effects and unexpectedly reduced the ants’ state of stress. Even if its functioning stays unknown, this drug could help stressed persons. Diclofenac had several adverse effects and may lead to dependence; meloxicam had far less adverse effects and did not lead to dependence; etoricoxib had some adverse effects and did not lead to dependence. Obviously, meloxicam was the safest of the three anti–inflammatory drugs. Experimentation on ants can thus inform practitioners and pharmacists on potential harmful effects of products before providing them to humans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以蚂蚁为模型研究的七种人类药物的作用简述
自2012年以来,我们使用蚂蚁作为模型来研究人类使用的产品的影响。在这里,我们总结了我们最近的七项研究,涉及绿粘土,氨基葡萄糖,西地那非,一种顺势疗法药物,以及双氯芬酸,美洛昔康和依托昔布,三种抗炎药。绿粘土是一种无不良反应的优良产品。对于人类来说,它可以减少胃酸,因此应该代替氢氧化铝或碳酸钙+镁,因为它们会产生副作用。葡萄糖胺也是安全的。它只会增加蚂蚁的移动速度,这种效应可以解释,至少部分地解释它的效率。西地那非有许多不良反应,其原因可能是敏感知觉下降。这种影响可能是由西地那非的活性引起的:它抑制磷酸二酯酶并增加cGMP和cAMP的量。用于减轻压力症状的顺势疗法药物伊格纳提亚玛拉(ignatiamara)没有副作用,出乎意料地降低了蚂蚁的压力状态。即使它的功能尚不清楚,这种药物也可以帮助压力大的人。双氯芬酸有几种不良反应,可能导致依赖性;美洛昔康的副作用要小得多,不会导致依赖;依托昔布有一些不良反应,但未导致依赖。显然,美洛昔康是三种消炎药中最安全的。因此,在蚂蚁身上进行实验可以让从业者和药剂师在将产品提供给人类之前了解产品的潜在有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association between parenting style and nutritional knowledge of mother with the incidence of stunting children aged 7-24 months at the sawah lebar health center Bengkulu Lipids in healthcare and medicine Myoma previa during cesarean section: a case report and review of the literature The fourth music therapy session Autecology of microalgae in Nsit Ubium river
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1