Attention, Openness and Ecological Attunement

Russell J. Duvernoy
{"title":"Attention, Openness and Ecological Attunement","authors":"Russell J. Duvernoy","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter translates Whitehead’s metaphysical results into existential implications, with Deleuze and Guattari’s work considered as one example. Attention is implicated in both of Whitehead’s forms of passage: the concrescence of actual occasions and the global passage of nature, thus arguing that attention is ontological in consequence and function. This requires further exploration of Whitehead’s conception of “society”. For Whitehead, societies as repeatable patterns of events tend either towards creative response to changing conditions (open) or limiting responsiveness to such conditions in the interest of conformity (closed). The chapter reads Deleuze and Guattari’s infamous “lines of flight” as closely resonant, though they additionally consider potential prescriptive recommendations towards intensifying affective capacity. However, the structure of becoming renders efforts to extract stable normative representations of such recommendations paradoxical. The chapter concludes with critical discussion of this paradox in the context of statistical norms and algorithmic data-mining, arguing that one stake of attention is resisting such closed loops in the interest of creative alternatives.","PeriodicalId":137199,"journal":{"name":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter translates Whitehead’s metaphysical results into existential implications, with Deleuze and Guattari’s work considered as one example. Attention is implicated in both of Whitehead’s forms of passage: the concrescence of actual occasions and the global passage of nature, thus arguing that attention is ontological in consequence and function. This requires further exploration of Whitehead’s conception of “society”. For Whitehead, societies as repeatable patterns of events tend either towards creative response to changing conditions (open) or limiting responsiveness to such conditions in the interest of conformity (closed). The chapter reads Deleuze and Guattari’s infamous “lines of flight” as closely resonant, though they additionally consider potential prescriptive recommendations towards intensifying affective capacity. However, the structure of becoming renders efforts to extract stable normative representations of such recommendations paradoxical. The chapter concludes with critical discussion of this paradox in the context of statistical norms and algorithmic data-mining, arguing that one stake of attention is resisting such closed loops in the interest of creative alternatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关注、开放和生态协调
本章以德勒兹和瓜塔里的作品为例,将怀特黑德的形而上学结果转化为存在主义含义。注意涉及到怀特海的两种传递形式:对实际事件的认识和自然的整体传递,因此认为注意在结果和功能上都是本体论的。这就需要对怀特黑德的“社会”概念进行进一步的探索。对于Whitehead来说,作为可重复事件模式的社会,要么倾向于对不断变化的条件做出创造性的反应(开放),要么为了顺从的利益而限制对这些条件的反应(封闭)。这一章读到德勒兹和瓜塔里臭名昭著的“飞行线”,虽然他们还考虑了潜在的规范建议,以加强情感能力。然而,生成的结构使得从这些建议中提取稳定的规范表示的努力是矛盾的。本章最后在统计规范和算法数据挖掘的背景下对这一悖论进行了批判性的讨论,认为注意力的一个利害关系是为了创造性替代方案的利益而抵制这种闭环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attention, Openness and Ecological Attunement Conclusion: Fabulation and Epoch(s) to Come Feeling as Creation: Affect and Tertiary Qualities Motivating Metaphysics: From Radical Empiricism to Process Attention, Equivalence and Existential Territories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1