The Effectiveness of Critical Evaluation and Questioning Techniques to Increase Students’ Critical Thinking Skill: A Case Study

Jacqueline I. Espina
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Critical Evaluation and Questioning Techniques to Increase Students’ Critical Thinking Skill: A Case Study","authors":"Jacqueline I. Espina","doi":"10.37058/jelita.v1i1.4283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a case study involving twenty-six (26) freshman Bachelor of Science in Social Work students of Leyte Normal University who are taking Purposive Communication in Semester 2, SY 2019-2020 as its subject. Based on the teacher-researchers observation and result of informal interviews with the students, they were generally quiet and seldom or never asked critical questions during class discussions because they were shy and did not know what questions to ask.  It explored the effectiveness of Verderber, et.al.’s critical evaluation and questioning techniques in enhancing critical evaluation and questioning behaviour or performance of the students, as well as its other positive impacts on them as students. The researcher has not encountered any studies that specifically utilized the said techniques. The intervention had positive results.  Based on the students’ responses, their critical questioning behaviour or performance was improved in the sense that they learned to ask questions for clarification, to express contradiction or opposition, and to test the credibility of information and validity of the speaker’s contention.  It also helped them transform into active learners, confident speakers, and critical thinkers.  Hence, teaching students’ critical evaluation and questioning techniques can enhance their critical thinking skills and increase their engagement as well.Keywords: Critical thinking; Critical evaluation; Questioning techniques.","PeriodicalId":423080,"journal":{"name":"JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v1i1.4283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a case study involving twenty-six (26) freshman Bachelor of Science in Social Work students of Leyte Normal University who are taking Purposive Communication in Semester 2, SY 2019-2020 as its subject. Based on the teacher-researchers observation and result of informal interviews with the students, they were generally quiet and seldom or never asked critical questions during class discussions because they were shy and did not know what questions to ask.  It explored the effectiveness of Verderber, et.al.’s critical evaluation and questioning techniques in enhancing critical evaluation and questioning behaviour or performance of the students, as well as its other positive impacts on them as students. The researcher has not encountered any studies that specifically utilized the said techniques. The intervention had positive results.  Based on the students’ responses, their critical questioning behaviour or performance was improved in the sense that they learned to ask questions for clarification, to express contradiction or opposition, and to test the credibility of information and validity of the speaker’s contention.  It also helped them transform into active learners, confident speakers, and critical thinkers.  Hence, teaching students’ critical evaluation and questioning techniques can enhance their critical thinking skills and increase their engagement as well.Keywords: Critical thinking; Critical evaluation; Questioning techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性评价和提问技巧对提高学生批判性思维能力的有效性:一个案例研究
这是一个案例研究,涉及26名莱特师范大学社会工作理学学士新生,他们在2019-2020学年第二学期以“有目的的沟通”为主题。根据教师研究人员的观察和对学生的非正式访谈结果,他们在课堂讨论中普遍沉默寡言,很少或从不提出批判性问题,因为他们很害羞,不知道该问什么问题。它探讨了Verderber等人的有效性。在提高学生的批判性评价和质疑行为或表现方面的批判性评价和质疑技巧,以及它对学生的其他积极影响。研究者还没有遇到任何专门使用上述技术的研究。干预产生了积极的结果。根据学生的反应,他们的批判性提问行为或表现得到了改善,从某种意义上说,他们学会了提出问题以澄清问题,表达矛盾或反对意见,并测试信息的可信度和说话者论点的有效性。它还帮助他们转变为积极的学习者、自信的演讲者和批判性的思考者。因此,教授学生批判性评价和提问技巧可以提高他们的批判性思维能力,也可以增加他们的参与度。关键词:批判性思维;关键的评价;提问技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lesson Study: A Systematic Routine to Enhance Students’ Social Character and Creative Writing Abilities Scrutinising the Contribution of Textual and Visual Resources in Campaign Posters: An SF-MDA Infused Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Skills in Oral Communication Tasks Voicing Philippines and Indonesian Students' Needs of Automated Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing Classrooms The Use of ELSA Speak as a Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) towards EFL Students’ Pronunciation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1