Organizational and Epistemic Change: The Growth of the Art Investment Field

Erica H. Coslor, C. Spaenjers
{"title":"Organizational and Epistemic Change: The Growth of the Art Investment Field","authors":"Erica H. Coslor, C. Spaenjers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2321627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What can studying the creation of knowledge tell us about how new technical fields emerge and develop? This paper shows how a knowledge community may be necessary to support the legitimacy of new products that undergo performance evaluation before purchase. Using historical and ethnographic data covering half a century, we review the growth of the art investment field through an epistemic cultures lens. Technical knowledge about the financial characteristics of art has been developed alongside practical knowledge about how best to structure investment ventures. Investment venture success has been determined by legitimacy as much as by profitability, given durable expectations about the evaluation and monitoring of investments. The growth of knowledge, practices and tools was thus a necessary condition for the recognition of artwork as an asset class. Crucially, the epistemic cultures approach highlights deepening knowledge, resources and professional expertise, and their development through experimentation, failures and negative knowledge. This shows accounting issues contributing to technical field legitimacy and emergence, such as the role of knowledge production, valuation practices and receptive environments, and the distinction between legitimate investments that can be valued and investment venture profitability.","PeriodicalId":103805,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"455 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

What can studying the creation of knowledge tell us about how new technical fields emerge and develop? This paper shows how a knowledge community may be necessary to support the legitimacy of new products that undergo performance evaluation before purchase. Using historical and ethnographic data covering half a century, we review the growth of the art investment field through an epistemic cultures lens. Technical knowledge about the financial characteristics of art has been developed alongside practical knowledge about how best to structure investment ventures. Investment venture success has been determined by legitimacy as much as by profitability, given durable expectations about the evaluation and monitoring of investments. The growth of knowledge, practices and tools was thus a necessary condition for the recognition of artwork as an asset class. Crucially, the epistemic cultures approach highlights deepening knowledge, resources and professional expertise, and their development through experimentation, failures and negative knowledge. This shows accounting issues contributing to technical field legitimacy and emergence, such as the role of knowledge production, valuation practices and receptive environments, and the distinction between legitimate investments that can be valued and investment venture profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织和认知的变化:艺术投资领域的成长
研究知识的创造能告诉我们什么关于新技术领域是如何产生和发展的?本文展示了知识社区如何在购买前进行性能评估,以支持新产品的合法性。利用半个世纪以来的历史和人种学数据,我们通过认知文化的视角回顾了艺术投资领域的发展。关于艺术的金融特征的技术知识与关于如何最好地构建投资企业的实践知识一起发展。考虑到对投资的评估和监测的持久期望,投资企业的成功既取决于盈利能力,也取决于合法性。因此,知识、实践和工具的增长是承认艺术品作为一种资产类别的必要条件。至关重要的是,认识论文化方法强调深化知识、资源和专业技能,以及它们通过实验、失败和负面知识的发展。这表明会计问题有助于技术领域的合法性和出现,例如知识生产的作用,估值实践和接受环境,以及可估值的合法投资和投资风险盈利能力之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovativeness and Church Commitment: What Innovations Were Most Important During the Pandemic? Firm-Level Determinants of Breakthrough Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review Beyond Listening: The Distinct Effects of Proactive Versus Responsive Customer Orientation on the Reduction of Uncertainties at the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation Sources, Drivers and Barriers of Innovation in Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing Whether the Innovation Policy Will Really Improve Enterprise’s Innovation Performance: Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1