The Colorblind Organization

Victor Ray, Danielle M Purifoy
{"title":"The Colorblind Organization","authors":"Victor Ray, Danielle M Purifoy","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter connects colorblind ideology to organizational processes. Despite advances in our thinking about colorblindness as the current dominant racial ideology, scholars are reluctant to tie this ideology to organizational processes – creating the impression that colorblindness is an individual attribute rather than a structural phenomenon. Because the frames of colorblindness are usually interpreted through interviews – as opposed to organizational practices – focusing on the frames reinforces the sense that ideologies are free-floating prejudices unconnected to social structures. In this theoretical piece, we draw on the organizational literature, to tie Bonilla-Silva’s colorblind frames – abstract liberalism, cultural racism, the minimization of racism, and naturalization – to organizational processes, showing how mundane organizational procedures reinforce structural inequality. We argue that organizational policies and practices rely on normative Whiteness, devaluing the cultural norms of nonwhites, and passing those practices to successive administrations. Ostensibly nonracial procedures such as hiring, promotion, and performance reviews are rife with racialized meanings.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract This chapter connects colorblind ideology to organizational processes. Despite advances in our thinking about colorblindness as the current dominant racial ideology, scholars are reluctant to tie this ideology to organizational processes – creating the impression that colorblindness is an individual attribute rather than a structural phenomenon. Because the frames of colorblindness are usually interpreted through interviews – as opposed to organizational practices – focusing on the frames reinforces the sense that ideologies are free-floating prejudices unconnected to social structures. In this theoretical piece, we draw on the organizational literature, to tie Bonilla-Silva’s colorblind frames – abstract liberalism, cultural racism, the minimization of racism, and naturalization – to organizational processes, showing how mundane organizational procedures reinforce structural inequality. We argue that organizational policies and practices rely on normative Whiteness, devaluing the cultural norms of nonwhites, and passing those practices to successive administrations. Ostensibly nonracial procedures such as hiring, promotion, and performance reviews are rife with racialized meanings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
色盲组织
本章将色盲意识形态与组织过程联系起来。尽管我们对色盲作为当前占主导地位的种族意识形态的思考取得了进展,但学者们不愿意将这种意识形态与组织过程联系起来——造成色盲是一种个人属性而不是一种结构现象的印象。因为色盲的框架通常是通过采访来解释的——而不是组织实践——关注框架强化了意识形态是与社会结构无关的自由浮动的偏见的感觉。在这篇理论文章中,我们借鉴了组织文献,将博尼拉-席尔瓦的色盲框架——抽象自由主义、文化种族主义、种族主义最小化和归化——与组织过程联系起来,展示了世俗的组织程序是如何加剧结构性不平等的。我们认为,组织政策和实践依赖于规范的白人,贬低了非白人的文化规范,并将这些实践传递给了历届政府。招聘、晋升和绩效评估等表面上不分种族的程序充斥着种族化的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Colorblind Organization Organizing Reentry: How Racial Colorblindness Structures the Post-imprisonment Terrain Race and Organization Theory: Reflections and Open Questions The Unbroken South: Political Parties and the Articulation of White Supremacy Theorizing a Racialized Congressional Workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1