Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002

D. Budgen, G. Hoffnagle, M. Muller, F. Robert, A. Sellami, S. Tilley
{"title":"Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002","authors":"D. Budgen, G. Hoffnagle, M. Muller, F. Robert, A. Sellami, S. Tilley","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2002.1267630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing awareness of the need to employ evidence-based arguments to support the practices of software engineering, rather than arguments based upon advocacy, has led to a growing interest in the related area of empirical practices. This workshop, held at STEP 2002, set out to address two questions. What techniques do we need for empirical software engineering? What are the 'grand challenges' that empirical software engineering should be addressing as a matter of priority? For practical reasons, these were addressed in reverse order, and we began by identifying what each participant saw as being the challenges facing the wider acceptance and use of empirical techniques in software engineering. We then classified and grouped the challenges so identified under the three headings of resource, technical, and strategic. The next step involved examining how the particular challenges could be addressed, what proposals for action we would put forward, and how these proposals might be followed up. A core element we identified was the need to provide some form of centralized resource (such as a Web site) that could support both research and teaching. In this paper we outline the role that such a site could have, and also identify some of the elements that are likely to be needed in any educational module that addresses this topic.","PeriodicalId":271935,"journal":{"name":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2002.1267630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The growing awareness of the need to employ evidence-based arguments to support the practices of software engineering, rather than arguments based upon advocacy, has led to a growing interest in the related area of empirical practices. This workshop, held at STEP 2002, set out to address two questions. What techniques do we need for empirical software engineering? What are the 'grand challenges' that empirical software engineering should be addressing as a matter of priority? For practical reasons, these were addressed in reverse order, and we began by identifying what each participant saw as being the challenges facing the wider acceptance and use of empirical techniques in software engineering. We then classified and grouped the challenges so identified under the three headings of resource, technical, and strategic. The next step involved examining how the particular challenges could be addressed, what proposals for action we would put forward, and how these proposals might be followed up. A core element we identified was the need to provide some form of centralized resource (such as a Web site) that could support both research and teaching. In this paper we outline the role that such a site could have, and also identify some of the elements that are likely to be needed in any educational module that addresses this topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验软件工程:来自STEP 2002, Montreal, 2002年10月举行的研讨会的路线图报告
越来越多的人意识到需要使用基于证据的论证来支持软件工程的实践,而不是基于主张的论证,这导致了对经验实践相关领域的兴趣的增长。这个研讨会在2002年STEP上举行,旨在解决两个问题。对于经验软件工程,我们需要什么技术?经验软件工程应该优先处理的“重大挑战”是什么?出于实际的原因,我们以相反的顺序来处理这些问题,并且我们首先确定每个参与者所看到的是在软件工程中更广泛地接受和使用经验技术所面临的挑战。然后,我们根据资源、技术和战略三个标题对这些挑战进行分类和分组。下一步是审查如何应对具体的挑战,我们将提出哪些行动建议,以及如何对这些建议采取后续行动。我们确定的一个核心要素是需要提供某种形式的集中资源(例如Web站点),它可以同时支持研究和教学。在本文中,我们概述了这样一个网站可能具有的作用,并确定了在解决这个主题的任何教育模块中可能需要的一些元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the role of services in enterprise application integration Thirteen Knights and the Seven-headed Dragon: an interdisciplinary software engineering framework STEP2002: advances and opportunities in software engineering practice Workshop on COTS integration and evaluation Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1