Transition from Multi-portal to Uni-portal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Modern Era Requirement

Javed Mirdad Tarar, Kashif Nadeem, Durre Sadaf Khan, M. Iqbal
{"title":"Transition from Multi-portal to Uni-portal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Modern Era Requirement","authors":"Javed Mirdad Tarar, Kashif Nadeem, Durre Sadaf Khan, M. Iqbal","doi":"10.29054/APMC/2020.999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Every passing day brings new innovations to medical science and Thoracic Surgery is no exception to it. We have witnessed gradual evolution in VATS from multiple ports to single port over the last two decades. Objective: To evaluate whether this evolution is worth in terms of minimizing the postoperative complication. Study Design: Prospective randomized observational trial. Settings: Aseer Central Hospital, Abha-Saudi Arabia. Duration: Two years and 6 months from September 15, 2017 to March 15, 2020. Methodology: A total of 68 patients were studied who were operated by same surgical team under identical operative environment. Both diagnostic and therapeutic VATS procedures were included in our study. Histologically proven Bronchogenic Carcinoma resection in order to exclude stage to stage bias. Results: Different variables including Anesthesia and operative times, blood loss and post-operative surgical complications were found to be same in both operative procedures. However, patients with Uni-portal VATS experienced much less pain post operatively, their chest drains were removed earlier and consequently they had shorter hospital stay over all. Conclusion: Uni-portal VATS has similar efficacy and safety as Multi-portal VATS yet it results in faster recovery and shorter hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":319424,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29054/APMC/2020.999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Every passing day brings new innovations to medical science and Thoracic Surgery is no exception to it. We have witnessed gradual evolution in VATS from multiple ports to single port over the last two decades. Objective: To evaluate whether this evolution is worth in terms of minimizing the postoperative complication. Study Design: Prospective randomized observational trial. Settings: Aseer Central Hospital, Abha-Saudi Arabia. Duration: Two years and 6 months from September 15, 2017 to March 15, 2020. Methodology: A total of 68 patients were studied who were operated by same surgical team under identical operative environment. Both diagnostic and therapeutic VATS procedures were included in our study. Histologically proven Bronchogenic Carcinoma resection in order to exclude stage to stage bias. Results: Different variables including Anesthesia and operative times, blood loss and post-operative surgical complications were found to be same in both operative procedures. However, patients with Uni-portal VATS experienced much less pain post operatively, their chest drains were removed earlier and consequently they had shorter hospital stay over all. Conclusion: Uni-portal VATS has similar efficacy and safety as Multi-portal VATS yet it results in faster recovery and shorter hospital stay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从多门静脉到单门静脉视频辅助胸腔镜手术的过渡:现代时代的要求
背景:医学科学日新月异,胸外科也不例外。在过去的二十年里,我们见证了增值税从多港口到单港口的逐步演变。目的:评价这种进化在减少术后并发症方面是否有价值。研究设计:前瞻性随机观察性试验。地点:阿拉伯-沙特阿拉伯阿西尔中心医院。项目时间:2017年9月15日至2020年3月15日,为期两年零6个月。方法:对同一手术组在相同手术环境下手术的68例患者进行研究。我们的研究包括诊断性和治疗性VATS程序。组织学证实的支气管源性癌切除,以排除分期偏倚。结果:两种手术方式麻醉及手术次数、出血量及术后并发症等不同变量均相同。然而,单门静脉栓塞术患者术后疼痛更少,胸管引流更早,因此总的住院时间更短。结论:单门静脉辅助治疗的疗效和安全性与多门静脉辅助治疗相当,但恢复更快,住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Success Rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Between Women with Lower Segment Uterine Scar Thickness more than and less than 3.5mm Circumcision; A Comparative Study Between ZACH Self-Locking Clamp & Bone Cutter Comparison of Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis Mean Lipid Profile among Patients Suffering from Oral Sub-mucous Fibrosis Reporting in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan: A Descriptive Study Peril Elements of Infection Severity, Disease Non-Improvement, Case Fatality and Management of Sars-Cov-2 in Sargodha Region Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1