Sharing serendipity in the workplace

Phillip Jeffrey, Andrew McGrath
{"title":"Sharing serendipity in the workplace","authors":"Phillip Jeffrey, Andrew McGrath","doi":"10.1145/351006.351037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Forum is a collaborative working environment that consists of two shared spaces: a space for informal interaction (Contact Space), and a workspace for synchronous meetings using audioconferencing support (Meeting Space). It is designed to enable people, who should meet each other to do so naturally, providing an environment for richer online interactions. This paper discusses three evaluations of the Forum Contact Space: a conceptual evaluation, a prototype evaluation, and an ethnographic evaluation. Each evaluation was undertaken to improve the Contact Space usability, examine whether it supports chance encounters, and learn from participant feedback, areas for improvement of future Forum versions.\nThe conceptual evaluation using focus groups showed group discrepancies regarding how the Contact Space would be beneficial for producing chance encounters. In the prototype evaluation, the findings suggest that chance encounters were produced and that the Concept Space was perceived as an environment for supporting group cohesiveness. A common theme from the findings of the ethnographic evaluation was the division of the Contact Space and its related parts into two tools: a core tool; and a peripheral tool, dependent on whether it was active. As groups are increasingly distributed over geographical distances, the benefits of a shared virtual space for communication and interaction are being realised.","PeriodicalId":193080,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/351006.351037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

The Forum is a collaborative working environment that consists of two shared spaces: a space for informal interaction (Contact Space), and a workspace for synchronous meetings using audioconferencing support (Meeting Space). It is designed to enable people, who should meet each other to do so naturally, providing an environment for richer online interactions. This paper discusses three evaluations of the Forum Contact Space: a conceptual evaluation, a prototype evaluation, and an ethnographic evaluation. Each evaluation was undertaken to improve the Contact Space usability, examine whether it supports chance encounters, and learn from participant feedback, areas for improvement of future Forum versions. The conceptual evaluation using focus groups showed group discrepancies regarding how the Contact Space would be beneficial for producing chance encounters. In the prototype evaluation, the findings suggest that chance encounters were produced and that the Concept Space was perceived as an environment for supporting group cohesiveness. A common theme from the findings of the ethnographic evaluation was the division of the Contact Space and its related parts into two tools: a core tool; and a peripheral tool, dependent on whether it was active. As groups are increasingly distributed over geographical distances, the benefits of a shared virtual space for communication and interaction are being realised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在工作场所分享意外发现
论坛是一个协作的工作环境,由两个共享空间组成:一个用于非正式互动的空间(联系空间),一个用于使用音频会议支持的同步会议的工作空间(会议空间)。它的设计目的是使人们能够自然地见面,为更丰富的在线互动提供一个环境。本文讨论了对论坛接触空间的三种评价:概念评价、原型评价和民族志评价。每次评估都是为了提高联系空间的可用性,检查它是否支持偶遇,并从参与者的反馈中学习,以及未来论坛版本的改进领域。使用焦点小组进行的概念性评估显示,小组在接触空间如何有利于产生偶遇方面存在差异。在原型评估中,结果表明偶遇是产生的,概念空间被认为是支持团队凝聚力的环境。民族志评估结果的一个共同主题是将接触空间及其相关部分划分为两个工具:核心工具;还有一个外围工具,取决于它是否处于活动状态。随着群体越来越多地分布在地理距离上,正在实现共享虚拟空间进行通信和互动的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Culture formation and its issues in personal agent-oriented virtual society: "PAWˆ2" A unified component framework for dynamically extensible virtual environments Collaborative virtual entertainment: (if you can't beat 'em, join 'em?) Exploring collaborative navigation:: the effect of perspectives on group performance When cyberspace leaks into the real world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1