Reproductive and social behavior of marmosets with special reference to captive breeding.

Primates in medicine Pub Date : 1978-01-01
G Epple
{"title":"Reproductive and social behavior of marmosets with special reference to captive breeding.","authors":"G Epple","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field studies reviewed above raise some doubts about the laboratory concept of the extended family as the basic social unit of the Callithricidae. As Dawson [6] suggests, wild groups might more closely approximate artificial laboratory groups. They probably consist of a dominant, monogamous breeding pair, its dependent offspring and separate hierarchies of subdominant males and females who stay associated with the group for various lengths of time. Some of these subdominants might be offspring or relatives of the breeding pair. As the field studies show, these groups are more or less open to immigrants coming from other groups. They possibly tolerate transient relatives more easily and for longer periods of time than nonrelated individuals. In spite of the relative tolerance of wild groups towards strange conspecifics, it appears most practical to maintain laboratory breeders as families and remove the offspring after they have participated in the care of their younger siblings. In this way their reproductive capacities can be utilized as soon as their parental behavior has developed adequately. Moreover, possible losses caused by keeping nonrelated adults of the same sex together are avoided. As pointed out above, some species are very aggressive towards strange adult conspecifics and some seem to defend territories in the wild. It seems advisable therefore to house them in cages which provide a certain degree of isolation from neighboring groups. We have found this to be more important in S. fuscicollis than in C. jacchus, particularly in densely populated colony rooms. We therefore house our animals in cages which allow no visual contact with any other group, and by doing so have reduced the general level of excitement in the colony room. We believe that aggressive displays between groups are responsible for a large amount of redirected aggression between mates and for some of the abortions we have seen in our colony. Moreover, Rothe's [28, 29] observation that the parturient female withdraws from her group and gives birth in relative isolation should be taken into consideration when designing breeding cages. Although not all individuals of all species might show this behavior [see 32] it seems to be widespread enough to be an important factor in breeding efficiency and might figure in some of the infanticides observed by us and other authors.</p>","PeriodicalId":76345,"journal":{"name":"Primates in medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"50-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primates in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field studies reviewed above raise some doubts about the laboratory concept of the extended family as the basic social unit of the Callithricidae. As Dawson [6] suggests, wild groups might more closely approximate artificial laboratory groups. They probably consist of a dominant, monogamous breeding pair, its dependent offspring and separate hierarchies of subdominant males and females who stay associated with the group for various lengths of time. Some of these subdominants might be offspring or relatives of the breeding pair. As the field studies show, these groups are more or less open to immigrants coming from other groups. They possibly tolerate transient relatives more easily and for longer periods of time than nonrelated individuals. In spite of the relative tolerance of wild groups towards strange conspecifics, it appears most practical to maintain laboratory breeders as families and remove the offspring after they have participated in the care of their younger siblings. In this way their reproductive capacities can be utilized as soon as their parental behavior has developed adequately. Moreover, possible losses caused by keeping nonrelated adults of the same sex together are avoided. As pointed out above, some species are very aggressive towards strange adult conspecifics and some seem to defend territories in the wild. It seems advisable therefore to house them in cages which provide a certain degree of isolation from neighboring groups. We have found this to be more important in S. fuscicollis than in C. jacchus, particularly in densely populated colony rooms. We therefore house our animals in cages which allow no visual contact with any other group, and by doing so have reduced the general level of excitement in the colony room. We believe that aggressive displays between groups are responsible for a large amount of redirected aggression between mates and for some of the abortions we have seen in our colony. Moreover, Rothe's [28, 29] observation that the parturient female withdraws from her group and gives birth in relative isolation should be taken into consideration when designing breeding cages. Although not all individuals of all species might show this behavior [see 32] it seems to be widespread enough to be an important factor in breeding efficiency and might figure in some of the infanticides observed by us and other authors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狨猴的繁殖和社会行为,特别涉及圈养繁殖。
对上述野外研究的回顾提出了一些对实验室概念的质疑,即大家庭是滴虫科的基本社会单位。正如Dawson[6]所指出的,野生群体可能更接近人工实验室群体。它们可能包括一个占统治地位的、一夫一妻制的繁殖对,它的依赖后代,以及在不同时间内与群体联系在一起的次占统治地位的雄性和雌性的不同等级。这些次优势中的一些可能是繁殖对的后代或亲属。实地研究表明,这些群体或多或少对来自其他群体的移民持开放态度。他们可能比没有亲属关系的人更容易忍受短暂的亲属关系,时间也更长。尽管野生种群对奇怪的同种物种相对比较宽容,但最实际的做法似乎是将实验室繁殖者作为一个家庭来维持,并在它们参与照顾弟妹之后将后代移走。这样一来,一旦它们的亲代行为得到充分发展,它们的生殖能力就可以得到利用。此外,避免了将无亲缘关系的同性成年人聚集在一起可能造成的损失。如上所述,有些物种对陌生的成年同种物种非常具有攻击性,有些物种似乎在野外捍卫领土。因此,把它们关在笼子里似乎是明智的,这样可以在一定程度上与邻近的群体隔离。我们发现这在梭形螺旋体中比在贾克斯螺旋体中更为重要,特别是在人口密集的菌落室中。因此,我们把我们的动物关在笼子里,不允许与任何其他群体进行视觉接触,这样做降低了群体房间的总体兴奋程度。我们认为,群体之间的攻击性表现导致了配偶之间大量的重新定向攻击,也导致了我们在蚁群中看到的一些流产。此外,Rothe[28,29]观察到,在设计繁殖笼时,应考虑到母体退出群体,在相对孤立的情况下分娩。虽然不是所有物种的所有个体都表现出这种行为[见32],但它似乎广泛到足以成为繁殖效率的一个重要因素,并且可能在我们和其他作者观察到的一些杀婴行为中有所体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunology and blood chimerism of the marmoset. Studies with the baboon endogenous virus and its pseudotype of murine sarcoma virus in marmosets. Differences in expression of surface marker characteristics on Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human and simian lymphoid cell lines. Characteristics of cell lines established from Epstein-Barr virus induced marmoset tumors. Susceptibility of marmosets to Epstein-Barr virus-like baboon herpesviruses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1