Poetry as Investigative Pedagogy: Issues of Ethics and Praxis in Hay and Thorne’s Last Days of the Mill, 2012.

P. Hay
{"title":"Poetry as Investigative Pedagogy: Issues of Ethics and Praxis in Hay and Thorne’s Last Days of the Mill, 2012.","authors":"P. Hay","doi":"10.60162/swamphen.6.11514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines dilemmas of ethics and practice in the author’s co-written Last Days of the Mill (2012).  The usefulness of poetry as a tool of social inquiry is considered, both in the immediate context of a dying pulp mill in an industrial town in northern Tasmania, and the wider symbolic import of the mill’s demise within an island wedded to an unrealisable vision of industrial greatness.  It is argued that there are forms of knowing in which poetry is far more efficacious than analytical prose, most notably elusive and grounded understandings such as ‘being there-ness’, and the accretion of a vividly storied mindscape expressed through the spoken word. The paper then considers the injunction of the Canadian poet, Robert Bringhurst – that ‘when he sees his people destroying the world, the poet can say, “we’re destroying the world”.  He can say it in narrative or lyric or dramatic or meditative form, tragic or ironic form, short or long form . . . But he cannot lie, as a poet . . . ’  The paper argues for a more nuanced and inclusivist ethic, even when, technically speaking, this requires an act of dissimulation on the part of the poet. ","PeriodicalId":197436,"journal":{"name":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60162/swamphen.6.11514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines dilemmas of ethics and practice in the author’s co-written Last Days of the Mill (2012).  The usefulness of poetry as a tool of social inquiry is considered, both in the immediate context of a dying pulp mill in an industrial town in northern Tasmania, and the wider symbolic import of the mill’s demise within an island wedded to an unrealisable vision of industrial greatness.  It is argued that there are forms of knowing in which poetry is far more efficacious than analytical prose, most notably elusive and grounded understandings such as ‘being there-ness’, and the accretion of a vividly storied mindscape expressed through the spoken word. The paper then considers the injunction of the Canadian poet, Robert Bringhurst – that ‘when he sees his people destroying the world, the poet can say, “we’re destroying the world”.  He can say it in narrative or lyric or dramatic or meditative form, tragic or ironic form, short or long form . . . But he cannot lie, as a poet . . . ’  The paper argues for a more nuanced and inclusivist ethic, even when, technically speaking, this requires an act of dissimulation on the part of the poet. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诗歌作为调查性教学法:海和索恩《磨坊最后的日子》中的伦理与实践问题,2012。
本文考察了作者合著的《磨坊的最后日子》(2012)中的伦理和实践困境。诗歌作为一种社会探究工具的有用性,在塔斯马尼亚北部一个工业城镇垂死的纸浆厂的直接背景下,以及在一个与工业伟大的不可实现的愿景结合在一起的岛屿上,工厂的消亡具有更广泛的象征意义。有人认为,在某些形式的认知中,诗歌远比分析性散文更有效,最引人注目的是难以捉摸和扎实的理解,如“在那里”,以及通过口语表达的生动故事的心灵景观的增加。然后,论文考虑了加拿大诗人罗伯特·布林赫斯特的训谕——“当他看到他的人民毁灭世界时,诗人可以说,‘我们正在毁灭世界’。”他可以用叙事或抒情或戏剧或沉思的形式,悲剧或讽刺的形式,短或长的形式来表达。但他不能说谎,作为一个诗人…这篇论文主张一种更细致和包容的伦理,即使从技术上讲,这需要诗人的伪装行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Collective Memory of the Hairy Man [Book Review] Teya Brooks Pribac's Enter the Animal Editorial Note: Ngā Tohu o te Huarere On Sharks Unseen [Review]Iris Ralph, Packing Death in Australian Literature: Ecosides and Eco-Sides, Routledge, 2022, 174pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1