Bioengineering, Science Fiction, and Medical Ethics: How Goes the Flow?

Anne Hudson Jones
{"title":"Bioengineering, Science Fiction, and Medical Ethics: How Goes the Flow?","authors":"Anne Hudson Jones","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.2016.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of their ability to foresee the future, artists and writers have famously been called \"the antennae of the race\" by 20th-century poet Ezra Pound. Whether writers, especially those described as science-fiction (SF) writers, inspire bioengineers with their depictions of imaginary futures or whether bioengineers with their inventions inspire SF writers may not always be clear. However goes the flow of ideas, the efforts of SF writers often point to new and challenging issues in medical ethics before others have identified them. In this short presentation, I will give examples of ways in which SF writers see the future concerns and ethical dilemmas that will be created by breakthrough cybernetic technologies such as cardiac pacemakers, artificial replacement organs, and implanted computer chips. The triumphs of bioengineering can lead from relatively straightforward ethical questions, such as whether bioengineered devices should be turned off or removed and, if so, in what circumstances, to profound philosophical questions about what it means to be human and how much human body can be mechanically altered without ushering in transhumanist and posthumanist futures. In concluding, I will consider how SF stories might best be used in the education of bioengineers to help alert them to the far-reaching philosophical and ethical dimensions of their work.","PeriodicalId":196856,"journal":{"name":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.2016.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of their ability to foresee the future, artists and writers have famously been called "the antennae of the race" by 20th-century poet Ezra Pound. Whether writers, especially those described as science-fiction (SF) writers, inspire bioengineers with their depictions of imaginary futures or whether bioengineers with their inventions inspire SF writers may not always be clear. However goes the flow of ideas, the efforts of SF writers often point to new and challenging issues in medical ethics before others have identified them. In this short presentation, I will give examples of ways in which SF writers see the future concerns and ethical dilemmas that will be created by breakthrough cybernetic technologies such as cardiac pacemakers, artificial replacement organs, and implanted computer chips. The triumphs of bioengineering can lead from relatively straightforward ethical questions, such as whether bioengineered devices should be turned off or removed and, if so, in what circumstances, to profound philosophical questions about what it means to be human and how much human body can be mechanically altered without ushering in transhumanist and posthumanist futures. In concluding, I will consider how SF stories might best be used in the education of bioengineers to help alert them to the far-reaching philosophical and ethical dimensions of their work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物工程,科幻小说和医学伦理:如何流动?
由于艺术家和作家有预见未来的能力,他们被20世纪诗人埃兹拉·庞德称为“种族的天线”。作家,尤其是那些被称为科幻作家的作家,是用他们对想象中的未来的描述激励了生物工程师,还是生物工程师的发明激励了科幻作家,这一点可能并不总是很清楚。无论思想如何流动,科幻作家的努力往往在别人发现之前就指出了医学伦理学中新的和具有挑战性的问题。在这篇简短的演讲中,我将举例说明科幻小说作家如何看待突破性的控制论技术(如心脏起搏器、人工替代器官和植入电脑芯片)所带来的未来担忧和伦理困境。生物工程的胜利可以从相对直接的伦理问题,比如生物工程设备是否应该关闭或移除,如果应该,在什么情况下,到深刻的哲学问题,如人类意味着什么,人体可以在多大程度上被机械地改变,而不会导致超人类主义和后人类主义的未来。最后,我将考虑如何最好地将科幻故事用于生物工程师的教育中,以帮助他们提醒他们的工作具有深远的哲学和伦理层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Inhibition of Bio-film Formation by Graphene-Modified Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection: A Comparative Study Novel Scalable Nano-and Micro-High-Aspect Ratio Structure (HARS) Biocomposites Generated under Physiological Conditions Thermal Management System for In Vitro Evalution of Circulatory Assist Devices at In Vivo Temperatures Distinguishing Motor Imagery from Motor Movement Using Phase Locking Value and Eigenvector Centrality Spin Coating of 3D Printed Cardiovascular Anatomical Models, Controlling Material Properties on Complex Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1